Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.
One of the most important milestones of recent decades is the advent of computers which has influenced people’s lives. Some people may hold the view that playing computer games is not good for children and they should not be allowed to play them. However; some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that it is better for children to play video games. From my own perspective, the former/latter belief is true. In what follows, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that playing video games is an entertainment which children can do in their leisure times that they do them alone or with their friends. It can be released their stress and pressure of their daily schoolwork. Hence, it is made them fresh and more energetic to do their assignments. For example, I, when I was a high school student used to play video games with my siblings on weekends. As a result, I got ready for next week and got much energy.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that video games are one of the cheapest ways to play. In other words, it does not cost much money in comparison to other games. Most families with any status can afford its expenses. It is not needed to pay extra money for gym or transportation to go the gym. Children should stay home and enjoy playing the game. For instance, in the neighborhood of us, there is a family living which it is not a wealthy one. Its children always play video games and their parents are happy that they are not needed extra money to register them in a gym.
In conclusion, this is my deep belief that not only computer games fill the spare time of the children, but they also are available for any children. Therefore, I highly suggest that children should be allowed to play them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 3 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Somayya | 73 | view |
- the causes of ice age 76
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 70
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 70
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 60
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than they do similar tasks all day long. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...hey should not be allowed to play them. However; some others may take an opposite viewp...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind substantiating'.
Suggestion: mind substantiating
...ng reasons. The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63719512195 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53501468432 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521341463415 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9170794694 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0526315789 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2631578947 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41942512526 0.236089414692 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131970789295 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164898279919 0.0737576698707 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296540105738 0.150856017488 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110209103196 0.0645574589148 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.