Is relating well to others more important than studying hard?
As we all know, today’s society needs versatile talents who own multiple abilities more than experts mastering in one aspect. It is increasingly hard for bookworms to gain achievement through sitting in front the desk and working hard. In that case, some people claim that socialization is more crucial than hard working. However, according to my perspective, studying hard is no less important than relating well to people, if not, more important than the latter.
First of all, knowledge is a solid foundation for doing everything. There is vast range of knowledge and information people have to know before they set out their tasks. Without hard working, they will never be qualified to make progress. For instance, doctors need to memorize a huge amount of basic knowledge before they can really operate a surgery. Scientists should understand all equates and do numerous experience than find out a new theory. Even businessmen would do better decisions via studying past cases. That is to say, no matter what fields you major in, hard working is prerequisite.
Furthermore, people can never waste time on studying but always spend to much time on relating others. People can at least learn something from every book they have read and every course they have taken, while usually gain nothing form maintaining a relationship. Those who keep meeting new people and making different friends spend too much time on time. According to a scientific research form Science Academy in China said that the utmost number of friends a person could have in his entire life is 150. It is unnecessary for people to try hard to expand their social circle because most of their “friends” will eventually become distant strangers.
Undeniable, relating well to others is indispensable. Students have a lot of group assignments and employees have group projects. Many achievements cannot be made without the joint effort however talented one person is. In order to perform well in both school and workplace, people should know how to communicate politely, solve conflicts smartly and ask for help without offence. Only in this way can people deal with problems and difficulties smoothly.
In conclusion, study indigently is fundamental for everyone. On the other hand, relating well to others is like a buff on the way to success. People can be well prepared for the future by mastering these two abilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-18 | fringe7920383351@163.com | 87 | view |
| 2020-06-13 | 地狱博士后 | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | tjehdaud12 | 68 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | quanjun | 90 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | quanjun | 76 | view |
- The diagram below shows how electricity s generated in a hydroelectric power station 73
- Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction today To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- 5 The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- 6 Average weekly household expenditure by region 2007 09 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...say, no matter what fields you major in, hard working is prerequisite. Furth...
^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ajor in, hard working is prerequisite. Furthermore, people can never waste time...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...waste time on studying but always spend to much time on relating others. People ca...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, so, well, while, at least, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18112244898 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83195783204 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6844126968 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.625 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.20833333333 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323754455304 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869074881138 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127152930992 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185586472993 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153150015248 0.0645574589148 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.