schools should ask their students to evaluate their teachers.
It is critically important to have a decent education during the initial years of life. Even though most people learn something during their whole life, knowledge acquired through the school has great value. Some people would not like the idea of evaluation of teachers by their students because it gives students some power over their teachers; however I am completely agree with the statement because the advantages of it overweighs the disadvantages.
First of all, many times teachers become complacent in their work; by asking students to evaluate their teachers, school is motivating their teachers to perform better. Sometimes teachers think that they do not need to change their teaching methods because they are doing it for years and become lax about their techniques. For instance, when I was in school Mrs. Pooja Pathak, our English teacher, was teaching in our school since past twenty-years. My mother also had gone to the same school and when she was in school Mrs. Pathak also used to teach English. At that time she has really good teaching methods, but over the time she become complacent and nowadays she doesn't care about her teaching techniques. So, if we include the evaluating system we students can give an honest review about it and there is a possibility that she gets motivated to teach better.
Second of all, students can point out their teachers’ mistakes, and this will help teachers to identify and correct their errors. This will helps to make them better teacher and to adapt better teaching techniques. For example, my brother’s school has adopted this evaluating method for their teachers. Their Social Studies teacher repeat himself very often, so his class became very boring. The students had decided to write a review for that teacher, and they issued the problem in their review. As a result, that teacher can identified that he does not need to repeat himself and by eliminating this he improved in his teaching.
In conclusion, school should ask their students to evaluate their teachers because it will inspire them to not become lax about their job and also they help to spot their mistakes and give a chance to correct it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...their teachers; however I am completely agree with the statement because the advantag...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... she become complacent and nowadays she doesnt care about her teaching techniques. So,...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...ify and correct their errors. This will helps to make them better teacher and to adap...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...takes and give a chance to correct it.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01652892562 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48844364355 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517906336088 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6016399233 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.166666667 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.552492526493 0.236089414692 234% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172607639591 0.076458572812 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172512119216 0.0737576698707 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.388599977802 0.150856017488 258% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114818614319 0.0645574589148 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.