Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends. Some people believe that this policy is great, others believe that this policy will discourage employees. What is your opinion and why?
It has been a controversial question for companies whether their staffs pay attention to business on their holidays. Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends. Some people believe that this policy is great, others believe that this policy will discourage employees. There are strong grounds for these such decisions, and the following paragraphs will aptly elucidate them.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that employees should allocate their weekend for their families, for they have less time to spend with them during the week. Therefore, this policy helps staffs to make a balance between their professional life and their private life. Furthermore, when people have enough time to manage their personal life, they will focus on their jobs at working time. Also, this policy can provide time for them to raise their knowledge, and develop their skills. As a result, this rule has benefits for both employees and company. For Clarify, I can mention my own experience with this policy in our company. Our company have stablished regulations to force employees to do their duties only at company’s center, and employees do not have a right to bring information out of corporation. As a result, they should not work after leaving company, especially on weekends. These policies help me to research in my major at free time, and on weekends. Therefore, these rules not only discourage me about my job, but also motivate me to work better and broaden my prospective in my major; consequently, I work with more efficiency.
The second noteworthy reason is that employees do not concentrate on works at their home, and it can cause serious problem for their business. To explain, I provide a hypothetical example. For instance, we consider a person who works as a salesperson in a company which produce kind of products. When he receives an email to quote a price of some products, and he does not have access to list of products’ price which it is in company's database system. Simultaneously, he is playing with his child, and answering customer's demand. It is firmly possible that he gives some prices to customers which are completely wrong. At such situation, customers consider his response as a document which they can refer. Finally, this story can end with that salesperson’s dismisal, and can diminish the company's income as a result.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to draw a conclusion that companies that limit their employee to work only on working time make a profit through staff's efficiency. Also this decision have great positive impacts on workers' lives. Finally, it is highly recommended that companies stablish rules which prevent employees from discussing business out of workplace.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The competition between friends always has negative effect. 73
- TPO43 85
- Children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smart phones, video games for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children’s development. 73
- Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends Some people believe that this policy is great others believe that this policy will discourage employees What is your opinion and why 49
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is much easier for people to achieve success without their family members’ help now than in the past. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ake a profit through staffs efficiency. Also this decision have great positive impac...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, for instance, in short, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2362.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1347826087 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86226013515 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7973544048 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.48 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303437278667 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965146553998 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144351091451 0.0737576698707 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237594407247 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.200613916881 0.0645574589148 311% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.