Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?
Modern technologies are very present in our families today. it became normal to see children in contact with different kinds of gadgets since they are babies. Even if some people do not agree with the idea to let youngers have contact with smartphones or tablets, I really believe that we cannot change the new generation's mindset.
First, due to a tremendous world's modification, population is facing a new way of life. Nevertheless, we still have a friend or relative who prefers not to be in touch with innovation. In fact, today it is almost impossible to survive without some important advantages that technology gave us. As an example, in the past was very difficult to find an address where we had to go. But, nowadays a GPS is something easy to access everywhere, such as in cars, smartphones or watches. Honestly, I prefer to let my son use it otherwise he can be lost in the city.
Second, children found a new way to study since last decade. Teachers changed their source of knowledge, using more computers during their classes. As a normal result, our children modified their way to do a research and the way how they absorb new materials. going to the past, houses had a library with hundreds of books. today, we have everything in our hands or just asking Google, as an example.
Also, technology gave us more security in our lives. Cameras in every place are monitoring everyone who is suspcious. Furthermore, habitants of a danger city can give a smartphone to their siblings and technology permits parents to know where their children are. Absolutely, I prefer to let my son to have contact with this kind of tool, instead of do not know where he is.
To conclude, technology can be helpful if we know how to use it. Youths can have contact with smartphones or tabletes with parents paying attention on what they are doing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Modern technologies are very present in ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...are very present in our families today. it became normal to see children in contac...
^^
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...y believe that we cannot change the new generations mindset. First, due to a treme...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...change the new generations mindset. First, due to a tremendous worlds modifi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...et. First, due to a tremendous worlds modification, population is facing a ne...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...herwise he can be lost in the city. Second, children found a new way to stud...
^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Going
... the way how they absorb new materials. going to the past, houses had a library with ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Today
...s had a library with hundreds of books. today, we have everything in our hands or jus...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... just asking Google, as an example. Also, technology gave us more security i...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... instead of do not know where he is. To conclude, technology can be helpful i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, honestly, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, still, in fact, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75465838509 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73064734759 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568322981366 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2049225303 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.55 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114228895886 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325486604377 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347248057438 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699917360218 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220623056828 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.