It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone profound changes and became more sophisticated. By this definition, monumental scientific and technological achievements have turned all past dreams into reality. Actually, it was always questioned whether this swift and tremendous advancement is owed to ambitious people or realistic individuals. Does the following essay take an elaborating look at when an aim is more achievable, by risky attitude or conservative?
There is no denying that the most significant factor in being successful in any business is will-power, a type of personality is no matter. Although this is a decisive factor, without determining a goal it is ineffective. Generally, ambitious individuals are strictly risky in their selections and impossibility has no sense for them. Furthermore, they are not being satisfied by regular conditions. For instance, Cristiano Ronaldo, Real Madrid football player, is a prominent example of ambition. Whereas, He is stood on the climax of football and has craved his name as an idol on the history. Certainly, that was his greed to success and being unique and believing intrinsic potential led him to record 5 golden balls and many other national and club honors.
Conversely, realistic people assess every aspect of matter before taking any actions. In fact, the not assume themselves as a creature with extraordinary capabilities. Based on experience the probability of defeat drops down with such viewpoint, also the level of prosperity never exceed from a certain point. These types of characters never try their luck on the risky businesses like betting and stock market or even trading in some cases. In this regard, a group of sociologists and psychologists carried out an investigation to find out what major element caused a person to get billionaire, scholar and famous athlete or actor (celebrity). They announced that most of these individuals have a common characteristic and that is ambition.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that both having ambitious dreams and realistic goals are essential for obtaining desired results. If the flavor of ambition outweighs a realistic perspective, fluctuations in the business would dramatically go up. While, as the understanding reality overcomes the emotion-based aspirations, we may witness stability in our business.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to succeed in a new job, the ability to adapt oneself to the new environment is more important than having profound knowledge about this job. 81
- Agree or disagree: to solve the problem of present and future, it is necessary to understand the past. 90
- 48. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important for governments to protect wild animals and wilderness areas for the future generations. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement, Professional athletes, such football and basketball player, do not deserve the high salaries that they are paid. 83
- The personal and work-related challenges that young people face today are not very different from the challenges their parents and grandparents faced in the past 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on characteristic and that is ambition. To wrap it up, according to the aforemen...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay witness stability in our business.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, conversely, furthermore, if, look, may, so, whereas, while, for instance, in fact, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44881889764 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24123921949 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650918635171 0.524837075471 124% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9569377949 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.05 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161877414122 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03758406407 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461669172063 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825808732453 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252724849555 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.