Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer

Essay topics:

Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer.

In today's world, information access in a simple way is more crucial and agreeable. Due to the fact that we live in a chaotic world that everything changes rapidly, which makes us more thirsty to get knowledge. We all have some profits which need to know about the last news. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether access to the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information or not. Some people possess the conviction that the former could be more mirthful, whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that the latter is more fruitful. I personally, content that this issue is multifaceted. I think in all situations we need to access verifiable information and it is a basic right for each individual person. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my outstanding is that accessing a lot of information helps us to get a better decision. When we know about all aspects and dimensions of our decision result, we can better decide. Although all the information is mentioned on the internet is not true and reliable but we can search simply for a certain concept and compare the results and then get a decision base on them. Consider my personal experience to make the point more clear. In the highschool, they charged me to research about the rare pieces of kaktus which are not found in my country. I read a lot of books in the school library but I didn't find any useful information. By using the Internet, I found more details about this kaktus and got a good score.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that by using the internet we can communicate with other people around the world and access their thought about a certain issue. It helps us to improve our soft skills like helping other people and connecting with them.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons,I agree with this statement that accessing a lot of information by using the Internet is more agreeable. Consequently, it is highly recommended that the government should improve the network access to all the parts of the country.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-14 ngaliulin 76 view
2022-11-15 rpinisetti8 86 view
2022-09-17 usef 73 view
2022-08-19 shiiwem 60 view
2022-06-03 Sudan Devkota 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user usef :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a simple way" with adverb for "simple"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
In todays world, information access in a simple way is more crucial and agreeable. Due to t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...ng reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my outstanding is that accessing a lot ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 644, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ot of books in the school library but I didnt find any useful information. By using t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...emplating all the aforementioned reasons,I agree with this statement that accessin...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, regarding, second, so, then, whereas, i think, in brief

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84514435696 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79196013006 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50656167979 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7261647914 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1578947368 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0526315789 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269466567445 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794780875678 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766472050364 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175841933462 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450689590298 0.0645574589148 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.