Some people think the media (including newspaper, televisions, radio, and internet sources) are less concerned with the accuracy of news. Some people think the information from the media are becoming incorrect. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion or not and explain why? Include examples and specific reasons.
The staggering progress of media in today’s convoluted world is obvious to everyone, and it is erected upon strong underpinning: accuracy and reliability. In this respect, some people cast doubt on the accuracy of news broadcasted by disparate types of media, while some others stand at the other extreme, holding the view that news scattered by various sources of media is authoritative enough to accept its contents. I side with the latter idea; the following paragraphs lend credence to my view.
First and foremost, with no shadows of doubt, media is operated by a handful of giant corporations, contributing to broadcast reliable news. These companies are managed with erudite, conversant individual spending most of their time monitoring, mentoring, and refining of information; the absence of which will lead to spreading fallacious, illegitimate news. An example can drive this concept home. I remember two years ago, one of the Iranian websites scattered the wrong information about one of the eminent, outstanding superstars. He made a complaint against the authorities of that website, and this phenomenon was a bitter scandal for the reputation of their scant regard about broadcasting false news. Having considered all the adverse effects of broadcasting fallacious information, people adhering of that top-tier website no longer visit the content, leading the manager to miss their hoard of income from mass seductive advertising.
What is more, what provokes news to be accurate, is that people use different sources to make sure about the legitimacy of the information. That is to say, nowadays individuals apply miscellaneous media, including newspaper, televisions, radio, and internet sources to keep abreast of the latest news. Correspondingly, not only can they gain the huge amount of information, but they also can compare the accuracy of news expanded by manifold means of communication, cultivating them to interact simultaneously in response to divergence news. Meanwhile, under no circumstances is the news to be left outdated or false, otherwise, it would stand to the reason that those types of media are superficial, transient, and ad hoc. Accordingly, the chief executives should take into consideration the available contents to the public. Take the mentioned example again. The reliability of that fallacious news revealed by those individuals keeping trace of latent information by surfing different media. Had those eager beaver people not doubled-checked the falsehood news, the inaccuracy of information would have not divulged to everyone.
To wrap it up, I have to reiterate my standpoint that news scattered by various media is reliable. This is because giant companies should broadcast accurate information so as not to provoke misleading news to people; and as the people’s awareness has heightened, they double check the reliability of news with other types of media to feel assured.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-28 | YijingZhang | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | niloo.candy | 85 | view |
- The most important problem affecting the society can be solved during my lifetime 89
- TPO44 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 78
- Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together. 73
- TPO1 8
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, so, while, what is more, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2487.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49006622517 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17099389107 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580573951435 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 783.0 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4694109284 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.894736842 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8421052632 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293377647486 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079739981618 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656855940082 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183018567089 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436799252942 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.