At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some universities, experts are hired to make these decisions, and students are almost never involved. Which approach do you prefer and why?
Education is one of the most important things in today’s world. Every educational establishment has its own policy for each aspect of a college’s routine, organizational questions, and administrative work. Some universities allow students to participate in making the decisions about some issues on the campus life, like what kind of food should be served in the cafeteria, working hours of the library etc. I believe that universities should trust these issues to professionals. I will broach some reasons that validate my opinion.
To begin with, the professionals usually have enough experience and knowledge to arrange the work of universities in order to benefit the student’s life on campus or outside of it. These employees structure their work leaning on surveys, that provide essential information about the school routine, psychological aspects of the learning process; biorhythms of students, even diets preferences could be considered. Also, one of the most important things is that the budget of the university always put the first on the table; it means they solve every problem accordingly to possibilities of the budget. It is all about management today. The professionals see the big picture, and they care about every detail of the process and this kind of consideration brings the best result.
If the administration would ask students to decide, for example about the library working hours, some students will suggest that 24 hours is the best way, the other half of students might disagree with this idea. The cause of this kind disagreement is that everyone has his own way of study, and the time of their biorhythm when students usually more productive. The night owls will vote for late hours of work of the library but the morning larks will give their vote to early morning’s hours. So, from that perspective administration would have to deal with two preferences and find the solution that will suit each side, but it might be pretty wasteful for the budget to keep the library open 24 hours, additional expenses for employees and utilities like electricity. It’s crucial to understand the solution to the occurred problem from the different angles and find the most beneficial one for students and for the administration of the university.
I think students go to university to get the knowledge and specific skills that are required for their future profession, it’s inappropriate to waste their study time and energy looking for the solutions that will keep the campus life and daily routine equilibrium. Furthermore, decisions that have been made by professionals would definitely sustain the efficient policy in all extents.
- Some young people have free time in the evenings after school or on days off the school. Which one of the following activities do you think would be most beneficial for young people (14-18 years) to do in their spare time? Why?-Gaining practical work expe 76
- Was the painting Portrait of an Elderly Woman created by Rembrandt 83
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage 3
- In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional schools. Which would you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- During the lecture it was discussed research that showed the pros and cons of teamwork in one company The opinion of the author contradicts the reading passage s ideas 70
Comments
Thank you
Thank you
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the efficient policy in all extents.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, for example, i think, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30373831776 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05424507233 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516355140187 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.2925670516 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.529411765 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1764705882 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220603395562 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736820767411 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112300997723 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142985504051 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106897330441 0.0645574589148 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.