For many people who have just stepped into new careers, they are usually anxious to find out the key to success. The debate over whether being able to adapt to various environments is the key to success rather than carrying outstanding knowledge of a specific field is still fierce. Some may suggest that having excellent knowledge of a job is the crucial point to success. However, I hold this view differently. I believe that adaptation to changing environments is the precondition to success.
To begin with, people who can stand out from changing circumstances always means they have knowledge of different fields, which is critical to success. Due to the increasing personal expense, companies increasingly require multi-skilled employees, enabling them to show outstanding performance in one area. For example, a graduate who majored in economics is needed not only to have experts in math and economics but also to master history and psychology, whereby they can create a correct model and predict the tendency of the market. Similarly, food marketing people need both marketing strategies and some economic and nutritional knowledge so they are more possibly to persuade their target consumers to buy products.
Admittedly, having excellent knowledge has its own advantages. People need to have enough expertise to do some work competently. Nevertheless, People who only focus on their job can never achieve success as a team. Most of the work today has to be done in cooperation with coworkers. People who are able to adapt to changing environments can familiarize themselves with other people quickly and start work more smoothly. Further, according to a recent study conducted by Harvard University, a survey about the most important quality people need in work has been surveyed by five hundred office workers. The study has shown that fifty-eight percent of people chose adaptation, and there are only fifteen percent of people picked expertise.
In a nutshell, it is undoubtedly better to adapt to changing conditions than to have excellent knowledge of a job for the reasons mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...pecific field is still fierce. Some may suggest that having excellent knowledge of a jo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 703, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'percents'?
Suggestion: percents
... adaptation, and there are only fifteen percent of people picked expertise. In a nut...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, similarly, so, still, as to, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27299703264 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93047401891 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569732937685 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2233051415 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.529411765 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33864648024 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10790526209 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892730361906 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233415821099 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967216886641 0.0645574589148 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.