Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to specifically explain how they cast doubt on points made in the reading passage.

Essay topics:

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to specifically explain how they cast doubt on points made in the reading passage.

The lecture contends that the arguments made by anti-immunization movement are invalid. While the movement statement against vaccination of babies and children seemed to be strong and accountable, each theory can be challenge with scientific evidence.

First, the anit-immunization group stated the most of the children suffered chronic ear infections after receiving vaccination since the young receives artificial immunity at too early the stage that the natural immunity is more preferable for children. However, those not immunized in the world have died and there is no evidence in proving the chronic disease infected ratio is higher in the vaccinated group than in the natural immunity group.

Second, the group claims that the children can still contract specific disease being vaccinated for later in life. Yet, no such cases have been found after investigation.

Third, the argument that natural healing is better than immunization, which vaccination is harmful, is based on no scientific research and has no referential value. In fact, no natural healing has been proved successful and that without immunization, the death number is 581 in Australia for instance, from diseases preventable by immunization between 1989-1998. On top of that, vaccination may hurt and yet is never fatal or harmful

In summary, the great number of deaths in areas of the world without vaccinations is clearly proof enough that the movement against immunization should not be taken seriously.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-24 jeffee 3 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user jeffee :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, still, third, while, for instance, in fact, in summary, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.01324503311 379% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5327510917 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02170785005 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602620087336 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4028601466 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.777777778 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4444444444 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.044151450394 0.272083759551 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250491430323 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321394498061 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0334860320152 0.162205337803 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03403347421 0.0443174109184 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.