teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Teachers are the most influential people in the society as they teach individuals. While most people believe that teachers should tell their social or political views to their students in the classroom, I tend to argue that this is not appropriate for teachers to reveal their political and social beliefs. In the following essay, I will vindicate my stance through two noticeable reasons.
To begin with, talking about political and social perspectives distracts students' attention from main courses. In fact, students cannot concentrate on the subject matter taught by teachers. As a result, not only will learning efficiency decline but also this is sort of wasting students’ time and energy. What I experienced is a compelling example to clarify this. Last year, in my biology class, the professor started talking about who was better to be elected as the president. In every session for the major of the class hours, he kept discussing this topic. So, at the end of the semester, he had to eliminate the most important parts of the lessons, having no time to provide students with comprehensive coverage of the book. This example shows that teachers should focus on the lessons necessary to teach, not telling their own political or social opinions in the classroom.
Another equally significant point is that teachers are role models for the students. In fact, students imitate teachers' points of view whether it is erroneous or not, affecting the society in this way. To illustrate this, last day I read an article in the field of the behavioral psychologist. The study indicates that students were influenced by teachers even more than their parents. The more accustomed students became with the teachers' political or social views, making it harder for them to hold their own beliefs. Hence, the author concluded that teachers had the potentials to shape the views of students, giving them no chance to identify and choose their own beliefs.
All in all, it is not suitable for teachers to share their political or social perspectives with their students. This is because not only can teachers not create a good educational environment but students will also stick to the same view as their teachers. This is why I believe that teachers should prevent making their own political or social views known to the students in the classroom.
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 78
- it is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' job than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' job- TPO 26 66
- TPO 24 73
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 76
- TPO 25 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'learn'
Suggestion: learn
...by teachers. As a result, not only will learning efficiency decline but also this is sor...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, while, in fact, sort of, talking about, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09560723514 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71260483665 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50645994832 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9287160342 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.536403608999 0.236089414692 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157969662028 0.076458572812 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185318314253 0.0737576698707 251% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380599377074 0.150856017488 252% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140685918537 0.0645574589148 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.