In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Some people believe that it is more favorable to work in haste and risk making mistakes than working with patience and ensure that everything is right partly because of the bulkiness of the works on their table. However, for me, I believe that it is much more advantageous to work with ease and ensure that everything is correct for the following two reasons.
First of all, it is better to work slowly and ensure that everything is correct than working in haste because, working in haste can lead to rework which is a poor indication of lack of expertise. Re-doing a seemingly completed work leads to lose of additional time and cost. For example, for a maintenance engineer, he required proper planning to carry out a maintenance activity such as making available all the required drawing for the tasks, carry-out all risk associated with the job, identify the number of manpower needed, and the cost involve to achieve a perfect task. If this engineer now decided to neglect all these planning step and rashly carry-out the task without a complete planning, the engineer would risk lost of initial cost of implementation which is not always a low cost and also risk loss of manhour, which is a major asset in a maintenance firm. It may count as double work as the cost and time required for the task would be doubled. Unlike if all the necessary plan is done with patience, the task would be completed with any cost and time risk even though it may take a little more time compare to if it is done rashly. So, in order to avoid rework which would leads to risk of doubling the cost and time required for the task, it is better to patiently do the task and ensure that everything is correct.
Second of all, carrying out a task in haste may have a negative effect on the doer’s reputation and image unlike if the task is done patiently. Risking making mistakes after you might have completed a task would make you feel like an unconcentrated and lackadaisical employee in front of your boss or client which may give you a bad name in front of them, even if you are the best employee at what you do. I remember a scenario in a book I read, where a new laboratory scientist risk making mistake in her first attempt to carrying out analysis. Rather than meticulously doing the test and get the optimum result possible, she decided to rashly carry-out the titration which leads to a lot of loss for the lab. Since then, she is always introduced by her boss to any visitor as the unconcentrated scientist. Her rashness to solve problem leads to a bad reputation for her and her boss don’t really give her precedence when it comes to performing the task. Therefore, hastily doing work and risk making mistakes can have a negative impact on one’s reputation.
In conclusion, with the aforementioned reasons, it is more beneficial to avoid mistakes by working slowly and make sure that everything is correct
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1980s not to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest 73
- Genetic modification a process used to change an organism s genes and hence its characteristics is now being used to improve trees Through genetic modification it is possible to create trees that produce more fruit grow faster or withstand adverse conditi 73
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 73
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues because in fossils the animals living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals Thus scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70 million ye 73
- Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States However many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons First the inc 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1189, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...o, in order to avoid rework which would leads to risk of doubling the cost and time r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2398.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65631067961 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63307701034 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440776699029 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.8753396028 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.058823529 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2941176471 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301454472679 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121623294714 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129329565214 0.0737576698707 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276037953844 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127252313509 0.0645574589148 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.