Topic: People in the past ate better food for their health than they do nowadays.
It is an undeniable fact that the quality of the food we eat plays a crucial role in our lives. Eating healthy food is a must for being healthy and as a result having a favorable life. However, there are differing opinions on whether foods we eat nowadays are healthful enough or not. Although some might say that the foods we eat now are much healthful, people in the past ate better food for their health than they do nowadays. There are two reasons: foods were more organic in the past and people’s values and habits have been changed over time.
First of all, the foods which people in past ate are more healthful than those of now. Because foods in the past are purely organic. They had grown without any additives such as pesticides or chemical fertilizers. Instead, people use eco-friendly agricultural methods like animal dung. Therefore, people did not have to worry about toxic chemicals on the skin of crops to be taken inside of our body and cause health problems. On top of that, with advanced science and technology, genetically modified foods gradually threaten our health. These days, it is even harder to find food that is not completely genetically modified. Whether you have noticed or not, 90% of foods in the refrigerator in your house are at least partially genetically modified. GM foods indeed have some advantages such as enriched vitamins in fruits and a reduced amount of pesticides required in the growing process. However, still, there are significant worrisome issues in GM foods. Since they are genetically modified, some of the genes used in GM technology might be taken from a food that causes allergies in some people. Also, given that some GM foods are modified using bacteria or viruses, there is a possibility of the emergence of new diseases.
On top of that, people in the present are too busy. The Standard of living in the past was simply to survive due to lacked health care services and strict caste systems. Most of the people focused only on their basic needs, not trying to overcome their social status because a limited population could succeed at that time. Therefore, food was one of the most important requirements in one’s life. On the other hand, in modern society, people’s value has reshaped leading to change their habits. In a materialistic society, one’s success becomes a great value. This makes people schedule their daily routine based on their tasks, ignoring their one out of three meals a day. For example, for Asian students, it is common for them to make do with fast food or skip meals because they are in a hurry to go to academies right after their school finishes. Because even an ordinary man ate five to six meals a day in the Song Dynasty, people in this day intake considerably insufficient nutrients.
As aforementioned, people in the past ate better food for their health than they do nowadays. Because the food itself is more healthful in the past and people are so busy now that they can not even have proper meals.
- Topic Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for young people to select a job in the same field as their parents than to choose a different career for themselves 80
- Caring for a pet is the best way for a child to learn responsibility 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y 86
- Caring for a pet is the best way for a child to learn responsibility 3
- Topic People in the past ate better food for their health than they do nowadays 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e are more healthful than those of now. Because foods in the past are purely organic. T...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 999, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s. Since they are genetically modified, some of the genes used in GM technology might be ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1059, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'food'.
Suggestion: food
...ed in GM technology might be taken from a food that causes allergies in some people. A...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, at least, for example, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2493.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80346820809 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54972635115 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516377649326 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1046598436 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0357142857 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5357142857 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495896499768 0.236089414692 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129347354475 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158270723374 0.0737576698707 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.364284151828 0.150856017488 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139008162576 0.0645574589148 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.