In the technology development era, there are multiple electronic companies that have invented and have been testing to launch automatic vehicles. The multitudes believe that in the next twenty years, cars will less appear on the street than today. I fervently advocate this theist because of the swift growth of technology and pollution.
To begin with, top-notch technological innovations seem to drastically modify humans’ commuting behaviors. Perceptibly, Tesla and Nico, the two biggest companies in America and China respectively, are in positive progress when releasing continually public automatic transportations. This means that people in the future can stop using their own cars which cost them fuel, annual maintenance, and parking fee compared to when using the automatic bus, it will cost customers less, which is synonymous to save them a large amount of money. For example, consumers from far and wide report that even though they have to pay more money to own the electric car, they can have free charging docs all over the country and the electric fee is less than fuel due to lack of material.
Further and even more importantly, another reason why there will be fewer cars in the future is that global warming is reaching its zenith. The temperature leaps unstoppably, which makes the greenhouse effect so that people have to reduce the amount of traffic used to save the planet. This is also the reason why activists protest commuters from using cars, instead, more public vehicles are encouraged to reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. The theist of changing to electric and automatic transports has attracted potential investors now that they ascertain that this field will boom and thrive in the future. That is why the assumption that there will be fewer cars in the future could be proved.
All things considered, the technology development and oriented-environment protection are likely to trigger the diminution in using private cars.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22712933754 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85631663447 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564668769716 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8837529428 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.461538462 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168468487976 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607081090599 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554187648146 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934598045329 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410131259363 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.