Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The Earth has been enduring plenty of environmental problems, especially pollution. There is an idea that increasing the cost of fuel will be the greatest method that all governments can apply. I cast doubt on this assumption, I strongly advocate that this idea will not work in several situations which I will list below.
To begin with, there is a theorem that when trying to ban something from humans, there will be a way to overcome it. This means that if the governments increase the cost too much, rich citizens might afford it but the poor people do not so that these poor people will try many ways to smuggle the low-cost fuel in order to consume it. This also created protests among social levels. Besides this bad effect, this strategy just has one advantage is that people will have a tendency of using public transportation due to the high price of fuel. This implies that there will be less carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere.
Another strange thing that increasing the cost of fuel brings is that this action nearly does not solve any problem in society. There is a suggestion that the government should invest the money into inventing and operating renewable energy. With many sources of renewable energy; solar, wind, hydropower; it will be more friendly to the environment rather than using fuel. Furthermore, this energy is created without greenhouse admission which means that it will reduce bad air pollution. With this investment, the governments not only solve the environmental problems but also create jobs for many unemployed people.
All things considered, increasing the cost of fuel just reduces the small amount of carbon dioxide in the air. To solve the air pollution, all the governments need to invest in renewable energy in order to have a fresh habitat to live in the far future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92857142857 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61827651344 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548701298701 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7471843215 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168881990489 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592068467293 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633295834224 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105268645533 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229477785088 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.