A university is considering establishing a new requirement for graduation in addition to its normal requirements about completing coursework all students must attend a course on public speaking to develop skills that will be useful in speaking in front of

Essay topics:

A university is considering establishing a new requirement for graduation in addition to its normal requirements about completing coursework: all students must attend a course on public speaking to develop skills that will be useful in speaking in front of large groups of people.

Do you agree or disagree that a public speaking course should be a requirement for all of the university's students? why? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Some people think that a public speaking course should be a requirement for all of the university’s students wastes time and money for students and university. However, I strongly support that a public speaking course should be regraded as a requirement. Therefore, I agree with the statement for 3 reasons.

First of all, students care about friends, and adding a public speaking course as a requirement can help students make more friends. For example, when I was a student in National Cheng Kung University, I participated in a public presentation class. To be more specific, I learned how to speak fluently and how to deliver a lecture clearly to normal audience. As a result, I used these speaking skills confidently to talk to my classmates and succeeded in making more friends. Yet, if I never joined the class, I might not have the courage and the ability to find topic to chat with my classmates. Apparently, requiring every student to take part in the public speaking class is necessary.

Secondly, universities place emphasis on reputation, and a public speaking course can allow colleges to build a higher reputation. Take National Cheng Kung University as an instance, it ruled that the public speaking should be a requirement for department of engineering when I was a freshman. In additon, it also asked every student in these departments to deliver a lecture on the hall as a condition of graduation. Consequently, many people thought that the university very focus on the capability of presentation in front of the audience and give it a respect. Nonetheless, if the university did not add the course as a requirement, people might think the school not care about the development of speaking. Obviously, the college was notorious for people.

Last but not least, universities also focus on students’ future, and requiring all students to take the class can provide students with a brighter future. For example, if all the students take part in the public speaking class, they can use their clear pronounction and fascinating intonation to present a report well. In addition, they can also use some gestures to help explan their PPT. Hence, they will be recruited by prestigious companies due to their excellent presentation. Nevertheless, if students never take the public speaking class, they might not present their ideas well during the interview. As a consequence, they might not be appreciated by the business.

In conclusion, I agree that a public speaking course should be a requirement for all of the university’s students. After all, students care about friends, and university places emphasis on reputation and students’ future.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-08 kevin1105 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user kevin1105 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...king course should be a requirement for all of the university’s students wastes time and m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...king course should be a requirement for all of the university’s students. After all, stude...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, after all, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2244.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17050691244 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09406083126 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442396313364 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3852462802 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5652173913 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8695652174 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398447095671 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12504977943 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932899682413 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269764321378 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055890802519 0.0645574589148 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.