A university should focus more on its facilities, such as libraries, computers or laboratory, rather than on hiring famous teachers
Some people believe that university should focus on hiring famous teachers, while others think they should focus more on its facilities. Both sides may have their own reasons to support their views. If I were asked to choose one, I would say, university should focus more on its facilities. There are several reasons and examples as follows.
To begin with, students can’t focus on their work if they study on bad facilities. Who would be able to enjoy working in a stinky place or studying in a narrow space? To provide a good education, good facilities must be provided beforehand. No matter how skillful the teachers are there, students will easily lose their interest and focus due to its surroundings. Also, nowadays, many students are doing extra studies after school for their projects. This means they require a comfortable place where they can rest and study. For example, In my old school, there was a visit from a famous football star and had a football lesson. However, due to its muddy playground, we couldn’t participate in the class and wasted time trying not to step on the mud. As a result, the whole class held another PE class. Therefore, good facilities must be provided before hiring famous teachers.
Next, schools will intrigue more students as their facilities are highly advanced. Many students want to use their school facilities as they have to spend their own money using other facilities outside the school. If a school has great facilities, students will spend more time inside the school, and as a result, the school can accumulate the funds as students’ spending increases buying drinks. For instance, my old school repaired a cafeteria and expanded the menus after harsh feedback. Not so long, many students spend more time in the cafeteria as it is repaired and school raise many funds as students spend more money on buying drinks.
All in all, everyone may hold a different view on the issue.
Yet, I absolutely support the perspective that university should focus more on its facilities.
The reasons behind this is as follows. They can intrigue more students and raise money and help students to focus on their work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | abusrddddd | 73 | view |
- 3
- some people say people taking risks can be more successful than people who are careful and cautious what is your opinion 60
- A university should focus more on its facilities such as libraries computers or laboratory rather than on hiring famous teachers 70
- If people need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others using e mail or text messaging is better than using telephone or voice messaging 70
- some people think that the important role of university professors is to do research others think the main role of them is to educate students 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97252747253 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53754562231 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502747252747 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3032732515 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6956521739 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8260869565 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206734823016 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066402513858 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915943252364 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131319341804 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10653365787 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97252747253 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53754562231 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502747252747 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3032732515 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6956521739 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8260869565 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206734823016 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066402513858 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915943252364 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131319341804 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10653365787 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.