Using clean energy can protect the environment, but the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive. which energy should be adopted?
In a society dramatically changing and developing every day, the ever-increasing need for energy has brought about a heated debate: should we continue using traditional energy like coal and oil, or turn to new and clean energy like nuclear energy and tidal energy? My answer to this question is definitely to use clean energy which is more environmental-friendly, more productive and source-saving.
First of all, there is no doubt that using clean energy is of great importance in environmental protection, for this kind of energy leaves less pollution and side-effects. Traditionally, coal and oil were burnt and the heat produced in the burning process was converted into needed energy in a chemical way, whereas the toxic gases and other substances, at the same time, were also born. These poisonous gases and chemicals blended into ecosystem without processing which, after years, gradually did harm to the whole environment. For example, the particles left after burning the patrol have caused severe air pollution in the northern part of China, blocking the sky with thick fog and haze. People living there suffer from coughs now and then, and even cannot hang out without a mask. However, things go differently when the clean energy is put in use. This kind of energy including tidar energy, nuclear energy and wind energy makes full use of the nature and converts other forms of energy such as kinetic energy, usually physically, resulting in fewer remains and debris. Therefore, negative effects on outer space could be decreased when adopting clean energy.
Secondly, compared to traditional energy, clean energy appears to be more productive. That is to say, with the relatively same amount of energy spent, clean resouces are always able to give out more energy at per unit than fuels, which equals that the ratio of transition is higher. To be specific, the nuclear energy, deriving from splitting only one tiny nucleus to protons and electons of which the diameter is only several nanometers, could engender a tremendous amount of electric energy for a whole factory to use for three days. This fact is quite incredible. Practically, this kind of energy has been put into practice in China where three nuclear energy stations have been built, resulting in enormous amelioration of energy efficiency.
Last but not least, as mentioned above, the resources of clean energy typically comes from nature, which means it is endless. As people have been anxious about the shortage of traditional energy that is relatively limited, clean energy is obviously a better choice. For example, to use the power of wind, all we need to do is setting up windmills on the slopes of the mountain. As a gust of wind comes and moves the leaves, the movements of wind will be efficiently transfered into energy for daily use. As long as there is a wind on this planet, there will always be enough energy to use. Likewise, the solar energy from the illumination and heat of sunlight, the tidar energy from the gravity of the moon and the terristrial heat energy from the core of Earth exist untill this planet venishes. Human would not worry about energy supply if clean energy were adopted.
For the reasons listed above, I strongly believe that using clean energy is the better choice. With the ever-growing development of technology, the day we make fully utilization of clean energy will not be so far.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?leadership comes naturally, and one cannot learn to be a leader. 60
- Using clean energy can protect the environment, but the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive. which energy should be adopted? 73
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus, such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at s 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?high school students should be required to study many different subjects at same time or they should study only three or four subjects at a time. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a chemical way" with adverb for "chemical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rocess was converted into needed energy in a chemical way, whereas the toxic gases and other subs...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example, kind of, no doubt, such as, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2849.0 1977.66487455 144% => OK
No of words: 565.0 407.700716846 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04247787611 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87542086881 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7179951888 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 212.727598566 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515044247788 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 917.1 618.680645161 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3724550878 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.708333333 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5416666667 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.528515024567 0.236089414692 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165157292511 0.076458572812 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998158601433 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339772454114 0.150856017488 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771564815185 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.