What do you want most in a friend?
Human beings have certain basic requirements, in order to live a fulfilled and grateful life. Friends are one of them. A friend can be defined as a person who will help us at our worst times, and a trustworthy person who will listen to us and guide us through the journey of life. Friends can be both permanent and temporary. Irrespective of the duration of the friendship, we expect that friend to guide us and be by our sides. Friends can be of various age groups and not necessarily be of the same age. Moreover, intelligence and adventurous are another two important aspects that many of us desire in a friend. If we point out our needs from a friend, there are myriad of them, depending on the severity of the situations. Let me present some of them.
Firstly, we expect our friends to be reliable. Reliability is not built over-night, but rather over a long duration and based on various scenarios such as how many times the friend has saved us from critical situations. For example, during our school days, when we used to bunk classes and go to watch movies, our friends used to save us from the teachers and our parents as well. When we grow up, we expect holidays with our friends. Without reliability, we won't prefer to travel with friends. Also, there can be emergency medical situations in our families. In these hours of need, we expect our friends to be by our sides. Clearly, reliability plays a huge role in choosing friends. Moreover, we are also expected to show reliability to our friends in their hours of need.
Intelligence is the second most sought aspect in a friend. Intelligent friends are required in all stages of life. These category friends are expected to help us with our assignments at the university or school levels, with our quotidian tasks at the professional workplaces, with financial advises at the middle age, and with post-retirement plans after we retire. Also, these category of friends are expected to teach us to develop critical judgement abilities instead of blindly following them.
Humor and adventure are the second runner-ups in the most sought aspects. Life without humor and adventure is banal and meaningless. For example, we are in a middle of a serious situation and we are bored. Suddenly, a friend with a good sense of humor throws a joke or says something funny. We all are bound to laugh in such situations. Similarly, when we are on a trip, we need people who love trekking or scuba-diving, or bunji jumping.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | Mahshid_lip | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough the journey of life. Friends can be both permanent and temporary. Irrespecti...
^^
Line 1, column 629, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...y of us desire in a friend. If we point out our needs from a friend, there are myri...
^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this category' or 'these categories'?
Suggestion: this category; these categories
...retirement plans after we retire. Also, these category of friends are expected to teach us to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74245939675 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77176641272 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482598607889 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 636.3 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1588948083 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3928571429 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 11.8709677419 202% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12164554261 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480054152618 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475523669282 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852274842166 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281782450561 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.