When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
There has been heated debate over the issue of whether the students learn much more effectively when teacher assign project on which students must cooperate together than when they are asked to work alone. While there are good arguments for both positions, the following discussion will explain in detail why I agree.
First, students who do project together can learn much more effectively than they do not because it helps students to be well-balanced. While students do assignments, we can be exposed to certain types of information and knowledge about the world, through education at school as well as at home. The problem with this is that most of the information and knowledge is conveyed from one source’s particular viewpoint. Given this, in order to become well-informed, students need to learn about diverse knowledge from colleagues. Thus, it is much better to work assigned project together than to work alone. In my case, I did research project about space exploration by taking general subjects in university. At first, I thought it was the great achievements of the governmental space projects. However, after I worked together with my colleagues in my team, my perspective on these governmental projects could not be solely positive when I also learned from my other classmate the difficulty of exploring space and huge budget. Without the help of my team, I might have held a slanted view of what was going around me.
Moreover, cooperating with others when doing project allows students to get the latest knowledge, and thus be better-informed. Today’s world is evolving at a surprising speed. As a result, students may have difficulty understanding all of the changes and new discoveries that come out. Given this context, it is important that students try to keep current through interacting with others who help them to know about various aspect of the project’s subject. Therefore, solving problems and working together on projects is better way to learn more effectively. In a recent survey carried out Harvard University, nearly two third of students felt that they could update their knowledge and successfully change their old thought through team projects. It is no surprise that there has recently been a drastic increase in the number of students who prefer a class offering team project assignments.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that students learn better through working on project together than working alone. By doing so they can also avoid becoming biased and outdated. These two reasons both connect to our increasing need to recommend assign team project.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o work alone. In my case, I did research project about space exploration by takin...
^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...dents may have difficulty understanding all of the changes and new discoveries that come o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...n, it is undeniable that students learn better through working on project together tha...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'in conclusion', 'as a result', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.213983050847 0.229887763892 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.175847457627 0.158761421928 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0783898305085 0.0866891130778 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0677966101695 0.046263068375 147% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0593220338983 0.0685040099705 87% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137711864407 0.118717715034 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0508474576271 0.0351676179071 145% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90629935893 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0275423728814 0.0309702414327 89% => OK
Particles: 0.00423728813559 0.00188951952338 224% => OK
Determiners: 0.0614406779661 0.0887237588012 69% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0190677966102 0.0209618222197 91% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0233050847458 0.0139019557991 168% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2622.0 2387.08602151 110% => OK
No of words: 420.0 408.028673835 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.24285714286 5.86048508987 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.392857142857 0.338922669872 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309523809524 0.251872472559 123% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216666666667 0.174417080927 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130952380952 0.112833075102 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90629935893 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.524397521467 102% => OK
Word variations: 61.4252162845 59.2087087015 104% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5533526081 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6440432566 48.84282405 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.857142857 120.699889404 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.5533526081 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.644075263715 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 50.9523809524 45.7405998639 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.32867132867 1.45489161554 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377933691831 0.300154397459 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0787284259213 0.103427244359 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0665573107299 0.0752933317313 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.42042867132 0.497263757937 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.120303976536 0.151897553556 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121015541146 0.114077575197 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132758731363 0.0781384742642 170% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.338010582594 0.336927656856 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0873327119155 0.067059652881 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282230208419 0.210909579961 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121296166822 0.0618886996521 196% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8870967742 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 8.42114695341 154% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.