whether the way of doing many things at the same time will make us lose the chance of achieving a good result.
With the development of technology and science, the ability of dealing with something with a good result is becoming more and more important, which lays a solid foundation for our achievement. However, the debate comes on whether the way of doing many things at the same time will make us miss the chance of achieving a good result. As far as I'm concerned, it is reasonable especially when considering the possible distraction and the loss of confidence.
Firstly, we are easy to be distracted when dealing with a lot of things at the same time, which definitely will do harm to the result of efforts made by us. For example, when we get some inspiration about our scientific research, we need to look for some information immediately and get some extension based on the inspiration further so that we can catch the chance of solving our problem. However, we can't get any benefit if we have to stop this important work and take part in some outdoor activity at that time, which is a distraction. It is likely that we forget what is the inspiration and what we want to do before after coming back. In a nutshell, on many occasions, to be focused plays an important part in our success.
Secondly, doing a lot of things will make us lose heart easily,which results from that we tend to be depressed because of the great pressure. As an internet survey revealed, the number of affairs which people face is proportional to the failure they get. As the professor who conducted the survey confessed, the capacity of one person is limited, more affairs mean more depress. What is more important is that the depress will reduce the work efficiency and quality, leading more failures.
Admittedly, some people assert that more things mean higher efficiency. However, after considering the bad effects brought by it, it is likely that doing many things at the same time only results in low efficiency and more failures.
In conclusion, based on the reasons I stated above, I still insist that dealing with many things leads to do few things well.
- whether a job which can lead to a secure and successful future is more easier to identify in the past compared with nowadays. 80
- whether it should be advocated to award money to children when they get a high grade 76
- whether the way of doing many things at the same time will make us lose the chance of achieving a good result 66
- how we should deal with these problems result from the teachers and meeting leaders. 71
- whether a job which can lead to a secure and successful future is more easier to identify in the past compared with nowadays. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...e of achieving a good result. As far as Im concerned, it is reasonable especially ...
^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nce of solving our problem. However, we cant get any benefit if we have to stop this...
^^^^
Line 9, column 63, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...of things will make us lose heart easily,which results from that we tend to be depress...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 411, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...depress. What is more important is that the depress will reduce the work efficiency and qua...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81073446328 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71301911622 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505649717514 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4594588013 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.533333333 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359424982075 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129127318726 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192422849802 0.0737576698707 261% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20461098598 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103052078416 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.