Which of the following should the government to spend money to benefit city or region most?
A. Providing more affordable housing
B. Decreasing air and water pollution
C. Attracting new businesses to the city or region
City development influences residents’ life highly, from the commuting to the satisfaction of daily life. Thus, the government considers it as one of the most important tasks, to provide residents a better living circumstance. Among all the choices, attracting new businesses to the city is what government should invest most in order to benefit the whole region.
Granted, providing affordable housing and eliminating environment pollution should be considered essential. In the metropolises, the rent per month for individuals may already be thirty percent of their income, leaving less money for the entertainment or food consumption. At the same time, bad air or water may induce health risks of all citizens, as there might be harmful minerals in the water and toxic chemicals in the air. Further, residents are less inclined to enjoy their life in such environment. Thus, both issues need to be solved. In fact, attracting new businesses to the city or region could not only solve these problems but also bring more opportunities and innovations.
Few would doubt that new industries could bring economic vitality to a region. Take financial companies for example. Their existence motivates the circulation of money, such as investments and loans. Through this process, other sections, like real estate, could develop new projects and further stimulate the opportunities for the whole city. As a result, residents will receive higher income and there will be more affordable housing units. Due to the new businesses; the original housing problem could be solved naturally without government aid.
Moreover, new businesses incur competitions, leading more innovations. Nowadays, technology is upgrading at an astonishing rate. The main reason behind is that globalization brings all innovators together and encourages them to surpass each other. When new businesses enter the city, they bring the technology already developed and make the old businesses be aware of the emerging challenges. To maintain their advantages, old business would also begin to innovate. At the same time, many innovative technologies are environment friendly: new energy cars, water filtration machines and even new methods of garbage landfills. The new technologies could benefit both the industry and the residents.
Although coping pollution and providing affordable houses are crucial for city development, the government should spend more money on attracting new business. Not only do new businesses bring vitality to the city’s economy, but they also offer innovation beneficial for all residents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | raspberry_momo | 93 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | raspberry_momo | 80 | view |
- Which of the following should the government to spend money to benefit city or region most A Providing more affordable housing B Decreasing air and water pollution C Attracting new businesses to the city or region 80
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement Scientific discoveries should be shared globally and the government should not keep them as secrets 92
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Competition between friends usually negatively impacts friendships 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement Scientific discoveries should be shared globally and the government should not keep them as secrets 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in order to benefit the whole region. Granted, providing affordable housing an...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng more opportunities and innovations. Few would doubt that new industries coul...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lved naturally without government aid. Moreover, new businesses incur competiti...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t both the industry and the residents. Although coping pollution and providing ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2200.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58375634518 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00461307998 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568527918782 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1643922175 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37630952507 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956397344435 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10835473628 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225346819844 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913865794262 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.