Do you agree or disagree with the statement: Scientific discoveries should be shared globally, and the government should not keep them as secrets.
Nowadays, as scientific researches develop at an astonishing rate, many countries have conflicts on whether sharing the results of researches or not. Some claims that sharing scientific improvements to the world benefits the whole human civilizations. In fact, scientific discoveries shouldn't be shared globally and government should keep them as secrets.
Considering the interests of the country, the government could utilize scientific discoveries to enhance the power of the nation as well as its economy. Once a new technology is invented, the discoverer is usually rewarded with patent for years. The patent aims to protect the benefits gained by the one who lead an improvement in scientific field. For example, the Soviet Union used to grasp the most cutting-edge technology of space exploration and exceeded many other countries. As other countries had conflicts with the Soviet Union, they often evaluates the discoveries hold by Soviet and ended up with compromises. Further, since government need to hire new employees and more researchers, this increases the vigorousness of economy. At the same time, the breakthrough of scientific researches may result in a booming development of some certain fields, even a brand new industry, which would be of great benefits to the nation’s economy.
Moreover, keeping technology as secrets benefits the scientists. Few would doubt that scientists need incentives and motivations to explore further on researchers. If their achievements are shared worldwide and utilized by everyone, the significance of their contribution would be viewed less. Thus, as the researchers are likely to be disappointed by the lack of attentions and rewards, they would be less passionate to do researches than before. When the government supports the local scientists with aids and propagation, they would feel acknowledged and become more willing to innovate. As a result, there would be more improvements and progress of researches.
Granted, some believe that global scientists could be inspired by others' accomplishment and generate more improvements benefiting the whole human civilization. Though the inspiration does make a great help of science development, the lack of knowledge protection actually harms the innovators and discourages inventions. Imagine that your discoveries spending huge amount of money and time could be used by anyone. Would you feel that your discoveries help yourself more than others? In fact, many would enjoy being the free rider of others' researchers and be less focus on their original ideas. Thus, the creativity of the whole world is diminished.
Although sharing scientific results is a great way to inspire more researchers, it is still better for countries to keep their discoveries as secrets. Not only does this approach improve the power and economy of countries, but it also encourages scientists to explore and generate more results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-20 | Rustin_Panda | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | raspberry_momo | 92 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | raspberry_momo | 76 | view |
| 2020-04-23 | Ericaa | 65 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement Scientific discoveries should be shared globally and the government should not keep them as secrets 76
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Competition between friends usually negatively impacts friendships 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement Scientific discoveries should be shared globally and the government should not keep them as secrets 92
- Which of the following should the government to spend money to benefit city or region most A Providing more affordable housing B Decreasing air and water pollution C Attracting new businesses to the city or region 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, as scientific researches devel...
^^
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ations. In fact, scientific discoveries shouldnt be shared globally and government shoul...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ernment should keep them as secrets. Considering the interests of the country...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t benefits to the nation’s economy. Moreover, keeping technology as secrets ...
^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... global scientists could be inspired by others accomplishment and generate more improv...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty of the whole world is diminished. Although sharing scientific results is a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, for example, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2484.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54464285714 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10888382568 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1650345254 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255119944813 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726708302207 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976093902682 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147065862324 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813331809878 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.