At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity – for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to work alone or with others? Why?
In the modern era, duty has played a prominent role in all societies. Because it is a paramount importance, researchers have always searched for finding ways to improve employees creativity. A controversial question which is often raised this idea is whether people tend to solve a problem that needs creativity alone or with their classmate or co-worker. I personally contend that working with group of people to solve a difficult problem has more yield than work alone. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first paramount factor to be mentioned is that working as group help the people to solve their problem readily. To elaborate on my point, when individuals work together for solving problems, they can better analysis an issue. In this situation, they can separate the issue in some parts, and distribute among each other so that they can find an influential solution easily. Therefore, they would better improve the solution, and increase their creativity. Considering a company of computer engineering for instance. They find a problem with their computer. In this case, if company collect their engineering as group, they would better solve a problem. They are thinking and sharing about the problem, and finally, they find the most beneficial solution.
Another reason which deserves some worlds here is that solving a problem with a group of people can decrease times that people want to find a solution. To shed more light on this matter, since people try to work as a group, they can save their times. Indeed, individuals work with each other and better analyze the problem rather than a person who work alone on a project. Therefore, they can save their time and better improve their project. In most important international project, we can see group of people that work as team projects. Considering Samsung mobile company for instance. When a mobile phone galaxy note S7 was introduced to the world, many people bought this product. But, this mobile face problem which it is burned. In this situation, the Samsung company organized a group to solve problems. They could solve problems less than a week. And it is result of group working. However, if a ones want to solve this problem, she or he may consume several months to solve problems.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that working as a group for solving a problem is more effective than work alone. I believe that not only working as a group improve creativity of the people but also working as a group help to save times and find an influential solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-15 | r.bostandoust | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-15 | mahi22 | 70 | view |
- Students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class Which one do you prefer Use specific reasons and detailed examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important way to improve people s health is to clean the environment 76
- TPO 40 73
- TPO 42 70
- To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 21, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (paramount) must be used with a third-person verb: 'factors'.
Suggestion: factors
...ding reasons. The first paramount factor to be mentioned is that working as grou...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 904, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...is result of group working. However, if a ones want to solve this problem, she or...
^
Line 7, column 904, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a one' or simply 'ones'?
Suggestion: a one; ones
...is result of group working. However, if a ones want to solve this problem, she or he m...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97045454545 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66163339988 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459090909091 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2467396682 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2962962963 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.45110844103 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0937150247451 0.236089414692 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326671316984 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295453775894 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762487126846 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208656169976 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.