Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, workers have had an important role in the societies. Many organizations are workers advocate and are struggling to hear their voices. Its importance leads to some controversy; some people want to know how workers would be satisfied by doing different tasks or just one. One statement in this case that is often brought up is that workers prefer to do just one task during the day, in contrast, I personally believe that they would be happy if let them do different tasks. In the lines to follow, I will investigate some reasons to shed light on my response.
One of the paramount reasons which deserves to be mentioned is that the new task looks like a breath of fresh air. Not only could a new task physically relax them, but also could relax them mentally. Indeed, workers how practice different tasks, wouldn't sense the passing of time rather than someone who just do and one arduous task. Take, for example, when I used to work at Pegah's company in Khorramabad, I accepted many responsibilities such as maintenance, cleaning my room, and typing. Although I did a plethora of work, I was very satisfied. Never did I look at my watch. In contrast, when I had done just one task, I was always anxious when I would be off. Therefore, doing just one task was mentally boring for me and instead of doing several works was appealing.
Another reason coming to mind is that these workers would be healthier. Should workers do one task, they would have to sit on a chair or take a position for a long time. Take, for example, when I used to type in Pegah's company, I sat on a chair for about 8 hours. When I got up, I got an excruciating backache. Indeed, I got sick and expended large expenses for healing. If not for that job, I would be healthier now.
Finally, doing several tasks would bring about creativity. Workers who take charge more than one duty would learn a wide variety of things. Take, for example, one of my friends is working in Iranian Automotive Industry. He is doing four tasks in the company. Working in the different areas, make him a jack-of-all-trades. Not only does he the mechanical works, but also electronic. When I needed him in order to wire my home, he accepted promptly. He was very satisfied with doing several duties. He thought, if not for working at this company and accepting several tasks, he wouldn't be able to do off-company works and make extra money.
In conclusion, to sum both reasons up, let use the Pareto rule which also known as 80/20 rule. In a nutshell, when come to making a decision based on the Pareto rule, vailing 20 percent of reasons could fulfil 80 percent of the solution. Consequently, both discussed reasons outweigh other potential reasons and are sufficient to substantiate the contention that workers which do several duties are happier than some workers which just do one task.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
..., workers how practice different tasks, wouldnt sense the passing of time rather than s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 576, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...company and accepting several tasks, he wouldnt be able to do off-company works and mak...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 638, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...off-company works and make extra money. In conclusion, to sum both reasons up, l...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, if, look, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2352.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 505.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65742574257 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67593852609 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493069306931 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.988528445 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8709677419 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2903225806 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90322580645 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324766893993 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815242761567 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066378439065 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187521691991 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031395892526 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.