Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, workers have had an important role in the societies. Many organizations are workers advocate and are struggling to hear their voices. Its importance leads to some controversy; some people want to know how workers would be satisfied by doing different tasks or just one. One statement in this case that is often brought up is that workers prefer to do just one task during the day, in contrast, I personally believe that they would be happy if let them do different tasks. In the lines to follow, I will investigate some reasons to shed light on my response.
One of the paramount reasons which deserves to be mentioned is that a new task looks like a breath of fresh air. Not only could a new task physically relax them, but also could relax them mentally. Indeed, workers how practice different tasks, wouldn't sense the passing of time rather than someone who just do and one arduous task. Take, for example, when I used to work at Pegah's company in Khorramabad, I accepted many responsibilities such as maintenance, cleaning my room, and typing. Although I did a plethora of work, I was very satisfied. Never did I look at my watch. In contrast, when I had done just one task, I was always anxious when I would be off. Therefore, doing just one task was mentally boring for me and instead of doing several works was appealing.
Finally, doing several tasks would bring about creativity. Workers who take charge more than one duty would learn a wide variety of things. Take, for example, one of my friends is working in Iranian Automotive Industry. He is doing four tasks in the company. Working in the different areas, made him a jack-of-all-trades. Not only does he the mechanical works, but also electronic. When I needed him in order to wire my home, he accepted promptly. He was very satisfied with doing several duties. He thought, if not for working at this company and accepting several tasks, he wouldn't be able to do off-company works and make extra money.
In conclusion, to sum both reasons up, let use the Pareto rule which also known as 80/20 rule. In a nutshell, when come to making a decision based on the Pareto rule, availing 20 percent of reasons could fulfil 80 percent of the solution. Consequently, both discussed reasons outweigh other potential reasons and are sufficient to substantiate the contention that workers which do several duties are happier than some workers which just do one task.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
..., workers how practice different tasks, wouldnt sense the passing of time rather than s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...company and accepting several tasks, he wouldnt be able to do off-company works and mak...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, if, look, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75886524823 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71865351003 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524822695035 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3939651248 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.52 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.92 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307349826149 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829276008585 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621347961008 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191264550109 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339449090182 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.