You have long been friend with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her？
Friendship is a catch-all term that refers to any reciprocal relations among people. In this respect, some relations are deeper, and individuals take advantage of not only mentally but also emotionally. There have been times that these relations might be suffered from turmoil. In these conditions, people need to be careful about their behavior so as not to annihilate their association. I lend credence to my view in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, intimate friends should not put an end to their prolonged connection for scant matters. In fact, due to the living in the hustle and bustle of metropolitan cities, many people have been suffering from stress-induced diseases, leading them to have chaotic, anarchic behavior. Undoubtedly, people would misbehave to their friends as an outlet of stress sporadically, albeit unwillingly. This would not be the enduring condition, and their behaviors turn to get better by the passage of time. In this regard, friends should be patient and carry out manifold avenues to alleviate their mental and emotional disorders; the presence of which will contribute greatly to weaken their concrete relations. It worth bearing in mind that noting is not gratifying more than forgiveness. By the meantime, these intimate, old friends can receive sympathy and goodwill from each other.
What is more, individuals are supposed to behave in a way based on unspoken friendly rules. That is to say, intimate friends show their hospitality in exchange for trust. Correspondingly, sometime friends would tell a lie or at least twist the fact to keep their concrete reciprocal associations; notwithstanding, the misleading impressions would be aroused. An example can drive this notion home. I am reminded of the days I was twenty, I was suffered from unknown, excruciating diseases. My intimate friend, Sara, was the only person contacting my doctor. Whenever I asked her about my general well-being, she diverted my thought to another subject. Having considered my condition, she decided to conceal the truth. At first, this behavior made me irritating, but she never described my disease. I could feel better after a year, and when I realized about my hard-to-cure disease, I got astonished about how to tackle with. Had I known about my problem, I would not be able to get improved on the assumption that I did not have positive, energetic morale to cope with illness. In fact, she was such a panacea for me.
In the final analyzing, I have to reiterate my standpoint that people should keep their old, intimate friendship. This is because some mistakes would happen unwittingly, and sometimes individuals should not be honest with their friends so as to help them tackle a problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-26 | niloo.candy | 86 | view |
- Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together. 80
- Do you agree that it is better to work for business owned by someone else than to work for the business of one s own family 87
- The most important problem affecting the society can be solved during my lifetime 89
- Some people think the media (including newspaper, televisions, radio, and internet sources) are less concerned with the accuracy of news. Some people think the information from the media are becoming incorrect. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion o 85
- TPO51 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...should not be honest with their friends so as to help them tackle a problem.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, as to, at least, in fact, what is more, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2293.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18778280543 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96521071095 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572398190045 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7985683828 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1923076923 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151483894129 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415498870303 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359541412798 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101814184987 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336698549376 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.