TPO52
According to the reading passage, it is better for humans to colonize asteroids than the Moon and Mars, for three main reasons. However the lecturer strongly argues against the reading passage by claiming that colonizing asteroids is not practical at all and all three benefits mentioned in the reading are questionable.
First and foremost, the reading passage claims that the low gravity environment of asteroids allows spaceships to land and take off easily, whereas the professor suggests otherwise. He says that low gravity on asteroids will pose a threat to human health. It is known from previous experience on spaceships that low gravity, even for a short time, will lower people's muscle mass and bone destiny. Long-term colonization on asteroids would be more problematic.
Furthermore, the reading suggests the asteroids are rich in valuable metals, which can be mined for profits and the cost can be covered. However, the lecture maintains that additional factors must be considered. For example, the cost of mining the metal and the transportation process will reduce the profit. Moreover, as the supply of metal resources increases, the price of them will go down. Hence, it is not guaranteed that the metals can be sold at the same price then.
Finally, according to the author, asteroids will be easy to access as they are closer to Earth than other the Moon or Mars is. The lecturer, however, explains that even though some asteroids are easy to reach, it might be difficult for human beings to return to Earth.To illustrate, the orbital paths of asteroids are unusual.At one point, asteroids may be close to Earth, but at other times, they will move away from Earth. Therefore, getting back to Earth will be a challenge even if we have settled on asteroids.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... Moon and Mars, for three main reasons. However the lecturer strongly argues against th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...ult for human beings to return to Earth.To illustrate, the orbital paths of astero...
^^
Line 7, column 327, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
... orbital paths of asteroids are unusual.At one point, asteroids may be close to Ea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06802721088 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69023322518 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568027210884 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3021955861 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407259693885 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137522913364 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864026365379 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228238356855 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646060218633 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.