The lecturer disputes the origin of a fascinating fossils found in the remains of Tyrannosaurus rex that lived seventy millions years ago. The lecturer asserts that the discovered fossils are not likely to be neither blood vessels, nor red blood cells. Therefore, the lecturer refutes each and every claim made in the reading.
First, the lecturer states that it is possible that those remains are colonies of bacteria that were living in bones. The author claims that the hollows in bones are traces of blood vessels found in the investigation organ. However, the lecturer contends that those colonies are not blood vessels, but they are indeed some organic material which represents moist residues of bacteria.
Secondly, the lecturer argues that the microscopic examination results revealed that the spheres are peaces of reddish mineral instead of red blood cells. According to the lecturer those spheres were discovered in the remains of some primitive animals which do not have red blood cells. Thus, having those sphere in such animals makes us believe that the spheres are indeed not red blood cells, but some peaces of a reddish mineral.
Finally, the lecturer excludes the possibility that collagen is the substance which is found after testing the leg bone. The lecturer argues that no collagen can be detect after seventy thousand years of the death of animals. Therefore, since Tyrannosaurus lived more that seventy million years ago, it is most probably that this is not collagen, but rather a traces of researcher's skin.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'fossil'?
Suggestion: fossil
...er disputes the origin of a fascinating fossils found in the remains of Tyrannosaurus r...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sphere' or 'those spheres'?
Suggestion: this sphere; those spheres
... not have red blood cells. Thus, having those sphere in such animals makes us believe that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 358, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a trace' or simply 'traces'?
Suggestion: a trace; traces
...y that this is not collagen, but rather a traces of researchers skin.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18072289157 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5069314082 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493975903614 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3447068767 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.5 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339759251842 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132946263583 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652513757416 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198887246943 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380797529083 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.