Changing study habits of young people
The article discuss changing reading habits of the young peoples, especially in literature. More specifically, in regards to the passage, writer thinks that there is a sharp decline in the literature among other reading material. In the reading passage, the lecturer is quick to point out that there are some serious flaws in the writer’s claims. In fact, the speaker believes that this is not the case, and addresses, in detail, the trouble with each point made in the reading text.
First and foremost, the author in the reading states that decline in the reading habits toward literature is very unfortunate because it literature is very crucial for the intellectual stimulation and in turn, it make an individual more imaginative and increase the understanding of language. The lecturer, however disagrees and stand in firm opposition to this claim. In the listening, the professor states that there are other books apart from literature which are of higher quality, such as, science journals, history, and political science books. She goes on to say that these books also stimulate imagination and thus have equal impacts as any literature.
The passage also claim that literature is being replaced by self help and poorly written books. It further claim that public is prioritizing more of their time in music and movies, and it also causing the decline in cultural level. Of course, though, the speaker does not believe this is accurate. According to her, spending more time in music or movies does not represent lowered cultural level, rather the culture has itself changed. She further explains that music and movies speak more directly to the audience and thus they are more popular today.
Finally, the author wraps his argument by positing that todays there is a lack of support for the writers as their audience is lacking, in result, publisher investing less money into literature. Not surprisingly, the lecturer points out issue with this claim by contending that less support to modern literature is a result of their complex nature. She thinks that today’s literature is very tough to understand and even earlier people will find it tough to understand present times’ literature.
To sum up, both the writer and professor hold conflicting views about the changing habits of young people. It’s clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Pros and Cons of deforestation 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...ially in literature. More specifically, in regards to the passage, writer thinks that there i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 214, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...ntellectual stimulation and in turn, it make an individual more imaginative and incr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'claims'?
Suggestion: claims
...lp and poorly written books. It further claim that public is prioritizing more of the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, so, thus, apart from, in fact, of course, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 1373.03311258 146% => OK
No of words: 389.0 270.72406181 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15681233933 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60033299463 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 145.348785872 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519280205656 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 419.366225166 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7206707012 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.099734603395 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348713194216 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838892578743 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658953563955 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640279932029 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.