ecoturism
The reading and the lecture re both about eco-tourism, which is the main point of the both.
The author in the reading says that the eco-tourism have less impact in the enviorment
The AUTHOR Cast doubts in the claims that are made in the article.
The lectures says that there is going to be an impact in the enviorment and the examples that she mention is that it’s necessary to build structures for the people can walk around the place that is going to be protected.
Secondly, The author says that the government it’s going to protect the areas where the tourist are going to visit.
The professor in the lecture contracts this, and she says that if there is an area that is protected, that is not a reason for people can explode the resources of that area, e.g. with illegal haunting.
Finally, the author says that the local people is going to be beneficiated with this eco-tourism.
Furthemore, The lecturer argues that, this new jobs are going to be usefull for the rest of the people except for the local ones that are going to have a bad job with a low salary.
- comics 73
- comics 76
- Why Pucón is the best place to visit in any time of the year 70
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
- ecoturism 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...laims that are made in the article. The lectures says that there is going to be...
^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'say'.
Suggestion: say
...e made in the article. The lectures says that there is going to be an impact in ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., finally, if, second, secondly, so, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 1373.03311258 66% => OK
No of words: 195.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62051282051 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41016912008 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 145.348785872 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 419.366225166 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.2341229032 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.714285714 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.09492273731 195% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.