Emperor penguins.
The reading and lecture are about Emperor Penguins. The lecture states that as per the old records the life is penguins is true but as per the new the data it is false. The lecture cast doubts on Penguins for three main reasons as per the reading.
First, the reading states that though they are unique and they can include hundreds of thousands of individual. As per the lecture, it is true that they are unique and diligent to the mates. It is not true that they stick to the same mates. they are not faithful for life. When they meet a mate they are with them but when they return back to their breeding they meet someone else. They have to meet them in a specific time frame. And it is only 15% of the time that they are together.
Second, according to the reading the penguins return to the nest land each year. Though their path is different due to shifting ice they continue to use rookery when they are hatched. According to the lecture, there were some satellite images taken. The images show that there were 6 instances where they didn't return back. Addition to hat there was entire relocation. They were recurring every year.
Third, the penguins were not endangered and not protected under international law. The population was stable. According to the lecture when the population count was conducted it was only 1/3rd%. They are unique but emperor penguins must be protected if they want to survive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ut as per the new the data it is false. The lecture cast doubts on Penguins for thr...
^^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...true that they stick to the same mates. they are not faithful for life. When they me...
^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...a mate they are with them but when they return back to their breeding they meet someone els...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uins return to the nest land each year. Though their path is different due to shifting...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... that there were 6 instances where they didnt return back. Addition to hat there was ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...there were 6 instances where they didnt return back. Addition to hat there was entire reloc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, third, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64285714286 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2649102839 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5885313622 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 58.5 110.228320801 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.6 21.698381199 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.25 7.06452816374 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.062589238981 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311966046506 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11127825591 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0552259006559 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650532296636 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.7 13.3589403974 50% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 53.8541721854 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 11.0289183223 51% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.74 12.2367328918 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.