However, in the lecture the man disagree with this develpoment and provides three reasons to refutes each of the reading reason.
The article states the work days of the employees should be shortened to four days a week as against the convectional five days of working and provides three reasons of support. However, in the lecture the man disagree with this develpoment and provides three reasons to refutes each of the reading reason.
First, the reading posits that reducing the employees work days to four days will increase the company profit because when these employees have enough to rest, it aids their work efficiency and hence increases the company's profit in return. Howewver, the man refutes this by claiming that the reduction of workers work days to four days will cause the company to spend more because the company needs to employ more workers to cover for the reduction od working hours and this will cause the company to provide more space and computer and hence, reducing the work days will force the company to pay more and the company will not profit as the reading states.
Second, the reading claims that reducing the work hours will provide employment. The man refutes this by saying this reduction will cause the company to want raise it expectation and hence make the workers to do more works than they should and this will make the work more onerous for the workers and at the end of the day the company will not employ new employees.
Third, the reading state thst resucing the work hours will improve the quanlity of employees life by spending more time with their familiees and going on vacation. However, the man opposes this point by saying reducing the work days will cause more harms for workers than good because it might cause the employees not to improve themselves and during recession these workers will be the first to lose their jobs. He explains further that the workers might be passed over when it is promotion time.
- No one can deny that there are negative and positive aspect of comparing the comfortability of life in the olden days to the nowadays life If i were to choose i would definitely agree that it is more comfortable to live now than the time of our grandparen 73
- However in the lecture the man disagree with this develpoment and provides three reasons to refutes each of the reading reason 60
- The article states that the problems in the painting suggest that it could not be a work by Rembrant and provides three reasons of support However the professor in the lecture explains that the painting belongs to Rembrant and provides three reasons of su 60
- One can deny there are positive and negative aspect of this prompt If i were to choose i would strongly agree that it is more important to keep old frields than new friends for a number of reasons that i will develop in the subsequent paragraphs 70
- No can deny there are both positive and negative aspect of this prompt if i were to choose i would definitely disagree the at the universities 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80126182965 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20280096605 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.410094637224 0.540411800872 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.384611782 49.2860985944 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.111111111 110.228320801 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.2222222222 21.698381199 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211135146864 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152982948936 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.260510051085 0.0662205650399 393% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19011590293 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194174549991 0.0443174109184 438% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.3589403974 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.