The passage and lecture are both about portraits which may or may not painted by Rembrandt which is the famous of the seventeenth centry The author claims three reasons to explain why he believe that portrait was not to Rembrandt The lecture casts doubt o

Essay topics:

The passage and lecture are both about portraits which may or may not painted by Rembrandt which is the famous of the seventeenth centry. The author claims three reasons to explain why he believe that portrait was not to Rembrandt. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in article. She says that this portrait is to Rembranbt.
First, the writer states, this painting is inconsistent, because lady outfit contine poor style like the white cap and luxurious style like fur color. The lecturer in the other hand mentions, the orginal portrait did not contain fur color. moreover, this color added to the painting to increase portrait value inorder to become like luxuy.
Second, the author argues, Rembrandt was a provisional painter in light and shadow. Incontrast, this portrail dose not have consistency in lightb and shadow. This is because , lower part of the face is bright, but below it dark fur color which suppose to absorb light instead of reflect it. The professor refutes this argument. She states, the color dose not find in the orginal portrait. there is only white color that reflect light to become lighter. the color as we said added to portrait later to increase its value.
Finally, the writer, illustrates to several piece of wood in the back of painting. He says, this is not Rmbrandt style.
The professor in the other hand claim, the original portrait contain only one panels. After years other panels added to extend the portrait. Furthermore, the type of wood used to made this portrait is the same type of tree wood used by Rembrandt.

The passage and lecture are both about portraits which may or may not painted by Rembrandt which is the famous of the seventeenth centry. The author claims three reasons to explain why he believe that portrait was not to Rebrandt. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in article. She says that this portrait is to Rembranbt.
First, the writer states, this painting is inconsistent, because lady outfetcontianed poor style like the white cap and luxurious style like fur color. The lecturer in the other hand mentions, the orginal portrait did not contain fur color. moreover, this color added to the painting to increase portrait value inorder to become like luxuy.
Second, the author argues, Rembrandt was a provisional painter in light and shadow. Incontrast, this portrail dose not have consistency in lightb and shadow. This is because , lower part of the face is bright, but below it dark fur color which suppose to absorb light instead of reflect it. The professor refutes this argument. She states, the color dose not find in the orginal portrait. there is only white color that reflect light to become lighter. the color as we said added to portrait later to increase its value.
Finally, the writer, illustates to several piece of wood in the back of painting. He says, this is not Rmbrandt style.
The professor in the other hand claim, the orginal portrait contain only one panels. After years other panels added to extend the portrait. Furthermore, the type of wood used to made this portrait is the same type of tree wood used by Rembrandt.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-14 talelaldabous 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture are both about p...
^^
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
... claims three reasons to explain why he believe that portrait was not to Rebrandt. The ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ieve that portrait was not to Rebrandt. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in ar...
^^^
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...nal portrait did not contain fur color. moreover, this color added to the painting to in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cy in lightb and shadow. This is because , lower part of the face is bright, but b...
^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... dose not find in the orginal portrait. there is only white color that reflect light ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...r that reflect light to become lighter. the color as we said added to portrait late...
^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun piece seems to be countable; consider using: 'several pieces'.
Suggestion: several pieces
...e. Finally, the writer, illustates to several piece of wood in the back of painting. He say...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ginal portrait contain only one panels. After years other panels added to extend the ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, may, moreover, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46625065848 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3758228593 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.2105263158 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8947368421 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10526315789 7.06452816374 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373499976166 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111557085269 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156670682867 0.0662205650399 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227427954617 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.288557962642 0.0443174109184 651% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.