The passage and lecture are both talking about using of vesseles which are found by archaelogist in Iraque as electric batteries The author claims three reasons which contradicts using of these vesseles as batteries The lecturer casts doubt on claim made

Essay topics:

The passage and lecture are both talking about using of vesseles which are found by archaelogist in Iraque as electric batteries. The author claims three reasons which contradicts using of these vesseles as batteries. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She states, the reasons which are mentioned in article are inconvenience.
First, the writer says, the vesseles did not attach to any conduction or wire towhen they has been excavated. The lecturer contradictes this notion. She mentions, other materials like wire and conductors throw away in the surrounding area. Moreovere, the archaelogist which are collect vessels as artifacts do not interested to these materials. therefore absence of wire and coductors does not mean that vesseles did not used as electric batteries.
Second, the author contents, copper inside cyliders of jars look like copper discovered in ruin Seleucia, which nis used to hold scroll not to generate electricity, there is no scroll inside jars. This argument is refuted by professor. She points out cylinder found inside jars used for holding scroll and addapted for other functions like generation of electricities, therefore these vessels used as batteries.
Lastly, the author states, an ancient people did not have any devices that replies on electricity. The lecturer in the other hand reputs this point. She says, these vessels generate vibration and shock when wrer touched. moreovere, they wrere used to releife muscles pain. Doctors can used them to treat patients.

The passage and lecture are both talking about using of vesseles which are found by archaelogist in Iraque as electric batteries. The author claims three reasons which contradicts using of these vesseles as batteries. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She states, the reasons which are mentioned in article are inconvenience.
First, the writer says, the vesseles did not attach to any conduction or wire towhen they has been excavated. The lecturer contradictes this notion. She mentions, other materials like wire and conductors throw away in the surrounding area. Moreovere, the archaelogist which are collect vessels as artifacts do not interested to these materials. therefore absence of wire and coductors does not mean that vesseles did not used as electric batteries.
Second, the author contents, copper inside cyliders of jars look like copper discovered in ruin Seleucia, which nis used to hold scroll not to generate electricity, there is no scroll inside jars. This argument is refuted by professor. She points out cylinder found inside jars used for holding scroll and addapted for other functions like generation of electricities, therefore these vessels used as batteries.
Lastly, the author states, an ancient people did not have any devices that replies on electricity. The lecturer in the other hand reputs this point. She says, these vessels generate vibration and shock when wrer touched. moreovere, they wrere used to releife muscles pain. Doctors can used them to treat patients.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-27 talelaldabous 65 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture are both talking...
^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s using of these vesseles as batteries. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bt on claim made in article. She states, the reasons which are mentioned in artic...
^^
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...h to any conduction or wire towhen they has been excavated. The lecturer contradict...
^^^
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...s do not interested to these materials. therefore absence of wire and coductors does not ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...s do not interested to these materials. therefore absence of wire and coductors does not ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 422, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...ors does not mean that vesseles did not used as electric batteries. Second, the a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s not mean that vesseles did not used as electric batteries. Second, the author...
^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreovere
... vibration and shock when wrer touched. moreovere, they wrere used to releife muscles pai...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, talking about

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37656903766 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71403988544 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569037656904 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.781901312 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5882352941 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0588235294 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462258143896 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14986609707 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161894379243 0.0662205650399 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302689083677 0.162205337803 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.252116575429 0.0443174109184 569% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.