Pros and Cons of deforestation
Writer and Professor discuss about the pros and cons of deforestation. While, writer think that deforestation is better for the overall growth of a society and must be done, professor have another thoughts. We will discuss it in following paragraphs.
Firstly, writer mention that deforestation provide farmland to grow crop and sustain ever increasing population. It says that deforestation is necessary to ensure food security. However, professor have another thought. He suggest that it is not worth to degrade forest ecosystem, rather new technologies should be used as to preserve forest. He mention that certain crops can be grown without soil and we should focus on that. Professor also gives an example of Brazil that already 60% of the rainforest area has been already cleared.
Secondly, the writer mention that with increasing population we also need to provide resident and we can do it only by cutting down the forests. It further mention that on deforested land, new towns can be build. Professor contradict it by saying that forest is also home to many plants, animals, and insects. Apart from that, alone rainforests are responsible for producing 28% of world’s oxygen and we can not justify cutting down the forests just for the purpose of making money. Instead of thinking about short tern benefit, we should focus on long tern consequences.
Lastly, the passage gives example of countries where a large population is dependent on forests for their economical upliftment by working on furniture, lumbar and other. The writing justify that deforestation is the need and such population and countries can not sustain themselves if we stop cutting down the trees. But the professor have other thoughts about it. He contradict above statement and said that the examples given by the author is from developing countries and there people are paid very less for such dangerous job. Also, individual does not benefit anything form deforestation, rather, the small business groups are main who is making money out of it.
The writer and author have very different views regarding the deforestation. While one write in favors of it, other simple contradict it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...ver, professor have another thought. He suggest that it is not worth to degrade forest ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...hould be used as to preserve forest. He mention that certain crops can be grown without...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mentions'?
Suggestion: mentions
...by cutting down the forests. It further mention that on deforested land, new towns can ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'justifies'.
Suggestion: justifies
...urniture, lumbar and other. The writing justify that deforestation is the need and such...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 370, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'contradicts'.
Suggestion: contradicts
...fessor have other thoughts about it. He contradict above statement and said that the examp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.01324503311 339% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 351.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20227920228 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77678556317 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1365343656 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9523809524 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7142857143 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11791792963 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379250797791 0.0996497079465 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715942324928 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070577179099 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762582027779 0.0443174109184 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.