Social media on Integrated task. Please summarize the reading and the lecture.
The reading and the lecture are both about social media and their effect in mental health. While the passage says that social media has no side effect, the lecture expresses a different point of view.
First, the passage claims that social media is great to advertise and is helping grow so many of the small businesses. The lecturer challenges the statement made by the author. He is of the opinion that option is overused leading to fake advertisements and a surreal competition that makes no sense. This is evident in the example with the Wish app where so many people purchased products that never arrived home.
Secondly, the author believes in social media interaction as the best way to communicate and express so much in a single paragraph or a picture. This is supported by the fact that so many photos become viral and transmit the message worldwide. This contradicts the lecture which states that virtual communication is separating people and fade the feeling away. Furthermore, he argues that nothing can make you feel the same as a handwritten letter and the texture of it in your hands. It is noted that people are more sentimental to thoughtful ideas and fall into deeper connections.
Finally, it is stated that people have more free time since all the goods are only one click away. He elaborates on this by mentioning online shopping, groceries are available online as well and life is so much easier. On the other hand, the lecturer contradicts the statement arguing that we are becoming addicted to our machines and we are going to lose the tactile sensitivity. He puts forth the idea that spending those two or three hours shopping around with your family, friends or partner is more pleasant comparing to just clicks on the keyboard.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61594257497 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4990100832 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.6 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0973960239462 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351050117718 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620871562443 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729547641958 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719427033995 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.