GMO products
The reading and the lecture are both about GM products, which is a concern nowadays. The author of the reading has a strong belief in GM food, thus will defend his theory
The lecturer challenges that statement by the author. She is of the opinion that GM food poses a danger to our habitat.
First of all, the author suggests that modifications will improve the quality and the number of products, moreover we are going to have more resistant plants and use fewer pesticides. It is mentioned that the introduction of the vaccine concept may improve the environment all over the world. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that the asexual reproduction and the cross-pollination will be affected as a side effect of this intervention. Furthermore, he argues that new allergens are being created and targeted individuals or the other ones that are not aware of any of them may have consequences. It is demonstrated with the peanut allergy and due to cross-combination everything that might contain peanuts ingredient may pose them to allergy risks.
Secondly, the writer contends that Gm is the only way to maintain the balance between the overgrowing population and their needs about food. Since we have the same territory and this expansion, we need to modify our products to produce more in a timely manner The lecturer on the other hand, posts that the costs of the research and experiments for this GM products will reflect in their price. Although we might have better seeds, their cost will be so high and they will not be able to afford. Moreover, this will increase the gap between the classes and will mostly affect the middle class
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 581, Rule ID: OF_ANY_OF[1]
Message: Consider simply using 'of' instead.
Suggestion: of
...ls or the other ones that are not aware of any of them may have consequences. It is demon...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a timely manner" with adverb for "timely"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... to modify our products to produce more in a timely manner The lecturer on the other hand, posts t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87632508834 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81745344702 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565371024735 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3972084716 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.153846154 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0416663377489 0.272083759551 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0107228424155 0.0996497079465 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371450157304 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0182994335447 0.162205337803 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316955486492 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.