Summarize the points of the lecture and the reading about Claudius empire
The reading and the lecture are both about the history of Rome, which talks about empire and kings.
The author of the reading believes that Claudios of Rome was a great emperor,.
The lecturer challenges that statement made by the author. He is of the opinion that Claudius was a terrible leader and no honesty at all.
First of all, the author talks about the remarkable innovation, the wisdom of the empire, and the importance of rules in making decisions. It is mentioned that he ruled over Britain island and the constructions of new harbor. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that his investing were mostly toward the army, paying the debt the conquer the throne, and maintain his power. Furthermore, he argues that his way of ruling over will bring to a civil war just like it happened.
Secondly, the writer contends that he stressed the role of slaves,l empowering them and giving an important position to the society. The article notes controversy in this opinion. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that he gave some position the to worst category of slaves, the trustful ones and the one he could use for his intentions. He elaborates on this by mentioning the most the most notorious and most corrupted people in important roles of society.
Finally, it is stated in the article that women rights and roles progressed by getting them involved in politics. The author establishes that his wife was one of them. The lecturer on the other hand, posits that his wife was well known for her bad behavior and and the one who murdered him in a sneaky way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...hat Claudios of Rome was a great emperor,. The lecturer challenges that statement...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...Claudios of Rome was a great emperor,. The lecturer challenges that statement made...
^^^
Line 4, column 344, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...mostly toward the army, paying the debt the conquer the throne, and maintain his power. Fur...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , l
...ends that he stressed the role of slaves,l empowering them and giving an important...
^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the worst'.
Suggestion: to the worst
...sserting that he gave some position the to worst category of slaves, the trustful ones a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the most'.
Suggestion: the most
...ns. He elaborates on this by mentioning the most the most notorious and most corrupted people in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 258, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ife was well known for her bad behavior and and the one who murdered him in a sneaky wa...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 291, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sneaky way" with adverb for "sneaky"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...havior and and the one who murdered him in a sneaky way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76895306859 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54080848366 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552346570397 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0910307417 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5625 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121181807702 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436298827524 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889361805302 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100059803074 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124042987 0.0443174109184 280% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.