Summarise the points of the lecture and the reading about the influence of new artists.
The reading and the lecture are both about styles of writing and the influence of different artist in a timely manner. The author of the reading believes in the freedom of expressing the feeling and not following any kind of rules.
First of all, the author suggests that punctuation it is not necessary and disrupts the author feelings while he transmits those. The lecture challenges that statement made by the author. She believes that a lack of punctuation is accompanied by weaker sentences, and it is an unnecessary tool to write.
Secondly, the writer contends that immersing styles from another field, just like they did when Stain involved cubism, will add more to the style. Furthermore, expressing ideas not only from the text but joining figures and sound will make it more complex and harder to perceive. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the lecturer argues with the statement. She elaborates the idea that the concept of beauty is everywhere but some styles cannot be merged together. For instance, the camouflage of cubism in writing is incompatible. To be abstract, part of another level, cold and not clearly interpreted it is not always called art. The lecturer puts fort on the idea that style means everything
Finally, it is stated in the article that the effect of each artist it is noticeable in history. The author establishes that Stein influence it is not remarkable whether during this time or later on the years. According to the lecturer, the impact of his style it is noted on Hemingway or many either one but with moderation
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a timely manner" with adverb for "timely"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...g and the influence of different artist in a timely manner. The author of the reading believes in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and it is an unnecessary tool to write. Secondly, the writer contends that immer...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will add more to the style. Furthermore, expressing ideas not only from the text ...
^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... perceive. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the lecturer argues with the statement. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9391634981 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67008424085 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574144486692 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6068530394 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.7857142857 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116318200613 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428248597731 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715918409159 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832143093712 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866495358212 0.0443174109184 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.