Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading passage is about the ancient reptiles who can fly and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor in the lecture refutes this argument considering it unconvincing and challenges all the points mentioned in the passage.
First and foremost, the reading avers that all modern and ancient reptiles are cold blooded, but unlikely Pterosaurs are warm blooded. The professor believes there are flaws in the author's position and oppose this argument by indicating that from fossils scientist discovered that there is a dense hair like covering similar to fur present typically in warm blooded which helps to form energy during cold environment. Furthermore, metabolism creates energy needed to fly. Hence the professor oppose the point.
Secondly, the text outlines that there is a limit of weight for animals for flight and Pterosaurs are to heavy. Nevertheless, the lecture posits that pterosaurs have anatomical features which makes them light weight. For instance, their bones are hollow instead of solid. Although their body is large but weight is low enough to keep them air borne by flapping of wings. Thus, the professor consider this point unconvincing.
Finally, the writer brings his argument to a close by suggesting that for powered flight animals have to take off from the ground. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this claim by contending that there is a difference between Pterosaurs and birds. Birds use only hind limbs (legs) to walk on ground and two limbs to push themselves when launch. Pterosaurs use all 4 limbs to push themselves for flying. It is a modern flying animal. Therefore, the professor considers the point in the passage invalid.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 472, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...etabolism creates energy needed to fly. Hence the professor oppose the point. Second...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: TO_TOO[4]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...r animals for flight and Pterosaurs are to heavy. Nevertheless, the lecture posits...
^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...ve anatomical features which makes them light weight. For instance, their bones are hollow i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22344322344 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66706916417 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586080586081 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.6143965092 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8823529412 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0588235294 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101443265148 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389600677589 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520028142221 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687605969346 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354596885011 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.