Summarize the reading and the lecture
Both the reading and the lecture discuss whether the science of archaeology meet limitations in Britain. While the reading continues to endorse this notions by stating several
reasons, the lecture fully contradicts with them.
To begin with, the author claims that worthy objects were lost when carrying out construction. Nevertheless, the professor indicates that before the construction took place, there were examines to discover whether sites remained. If there were something, the government would plan to keep or excavate those precious artifacts.
Secondly, the writer states that archaeologists complained about the inadequate financial support. The lecturer thoroughly opposes this opinion. She says that the government didn't pay for the archaeological research but the construction company. They purchased for the check of cites so the archaeologist actually had further grant.
Finally, the reading tells that having a job in archaeology was really tough. However, the lecturer mentions that there were loads of work to do during processing the project. She gives examples of doing research, writing paper,... to illustrate the increase of jobs in archaeology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-14 | Cheese in Alaska | 70 | view |
| 2024-01-12 | saamaan | 3 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | mhp1234 | 3 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | mhp1234 | view | |
| 2023-08-31 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement ?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 76
- Summarize the reading and the lecture 80
- Summarize the lecture and the reading 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 66
- Summarize the reading and the listening 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the reading and the lecture discuss...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e lecture fully contradicts with them. To begin with, the author claims that wo...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or excavate those precious artifacts. Secondly, the writer states that archaeo...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...s opinion. She says that the government didnt pay for the archaeological research but...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'granted'.
Suggestion: granted
... the archaeologist actually had further grant. Finally, the reading tells th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aeologist actually had further grant. Finally, the reading tells that having a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...xamples of doing research, writing paper,... to illustrate the increase of jobs in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 174.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77586206897 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95872093892 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.701149425287 0.540411800872 130% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4874374439 49.2860985944 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.3076923077 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3846153846 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190660900734 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615069774361 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841044635547 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113542747719 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866867100674 0.0443174109184 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.65 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.