The reading passage and the lecture has conflicting opinions about whether or not the memoir of the Chevalier is true. While the article explains the reasons that his memoir was false, the lecture refutes all the points mentioned in the passage using its own reasons and evidence.
First and foremost, according to the author, Chevalier Swiss merchant had lent a huge sum of money to Chevalier. As a result, if he was wealthy and prosperous, he would not have to borrow the money. Nonetheless, the professor rebuts these points by declaring that while waiting for his money to arrive, he had to borrow money from other places. ]]
Furthermore, the author of the article mentions that it is impossible to record the conversation in the memoir precisely as it has been written for a long time. On the other hand, the lecturer contends this by saying Chevalier wrote down everything he could remember from them and has preserved his notes for years. In addition, she points out that he has constantly referred to his notes.
Finally, the text insists that Chevalier paid money to escape from the jail in which he had a connection with his acquaintance in the place which helped to free him using cash. However, the lecturer asserts that even more powerful mates in the prison were not able to escape, so it is not possible for Chevalier to get out of jail too.
In conclusion, the reading passage mentions three different ideas about why Chevalier's memoir is not believable. The lecture opposes all of the points using its own reasons and evidence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... lecture has conflicting opinions about whether or not the memoir of the Chevalier is true. Wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '[' seems to be missing
... had to borrow money from other places. ]] Furthermore, the author of the arti...
^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the closing parenthesis
Suggestion: ]
... had to borrow money from other places. ]] Furthermore, the author of the arti...
^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '[' seems to be missing
...had to borrow money from other places. ]] Furthermore, the author of the artic...
^
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... is not believable. The lecture opposes all of the points using its own reasons and eviden...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88301886792 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56863498607 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532075471698 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.604599422 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.833333333 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212964428805 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803686180513 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376596284276 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120364923903 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404908729073 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.