The reading passage describes the reasons why one certain portrait attributed to Rembrandt was removed from official catalog of his works. The lecture, in contradiction to the Reading, describes how the panel of experts came up with the conclusion that portrait nevertheless is the original work of Rembrandt.
First reason named in the reading is that lady on the portrait is wearing the strange mix of white linen cap which could be worn by servant only and of fur coat which could be afforded only by a very rich person. As far as Rembrandt is known for his almost attention to the details, he would never paint a character dressed as such. However, the professor in the lecture explains that panel of expert did analysis of colors on the painting which discovered that fur on the woman's clothes was painted at one hundred years later that painting itself. It might have been someone's attempt to increase the value of the painting turning it into the portrait of reach aristocratic lady instead of poor one.
The second reason from the reading is based on manner of Rembrandt to draw light and shadow, and on the painting these elements are different from well known Rembrandt's manner. The professor challenges this statement saying that on original painting before the changes done hundred years later the composition of lights and shadows was different from what is seeing there now. In particular, the cloth was painted in simple, light color which eliminated face of the woman, and that exactly is a mix of light and shadow of Rembrandt style.
The third objective from the reading was in regard to wood panel on which painting was made. The panel consists of 3 different layers of wood which are glued together. And no other work of Rembrandt was done on same type of panel. The lecturer casts doubt on validity of this evidence, mentioning the analysis done by experts. That analysis discovered that wood from the layers has complete match with the wood from other Remrandts' painting - his self-portrait in the hat meaning the panel of self portrait was made from the same tree as glued panels of the portrait of the lady in white cap.
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 83
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 73
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 81
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...iginal painting before the changes done hundred years later the composition of lights a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, well, in particular, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 30.3222958057 208% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 369.0 270.72406181 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83468834688 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48973935288 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493224932249 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2276157113 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.428571429 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3571428571 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.541784710111 0.272083759551 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186247566157 0.0996497079465 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848038661132 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317914100226 0.162205337803 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807998250342 0.0443174109184 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.