TPO 25
Both the author and the lecturer discuss whether the vessels used as electric batteries in ancient times or not. While the author argues that it was not possible to use vessels as electric batteries, the lecturer disagrees with this idea, casting doubt on every single point the author mentioned.
First of all, the author believes that if these vessels were used as batteries, they should have been attached to some electric conductors such as metal wires but all that had been excavated were vessels themselves. On the contrary, the lecturer possesses the idea that the vessels discovered by local people not archeologists. Also, local people might have found wires or other conductors near the jars but because they were not trained, they could not recognize them, considering them as uninteresting things or throwing them away.
Second, the author states that the copper cylinders inside the jars were similar to the copper cylinders discovered in the ruins of Seleucia and people there used these copper cylinders for holding strolls and the reason why the scrolls did not find inside them is that they disintegrated over centuries. So, it is more likely that the vessels used for the same purpose as the Seleucia cylinders since they looked alike. However, the lecturer believes that they actually looked alike but this similarity cannot prove anything. Furthermore, she states that when people used the copper cylinders of the jars with the presence of iron rods and liquid, it produced electricity. Therefore, it can be inferred that producing electricity was the second purpose of these cylinders.
Finally, the author believes that these vessels were useless to ancient people as batteries generating electricity because they had no devices that replied on electricity. In opposition to this, the lecturer brings up the idea that these vessels produced a mild shock when people touched them because of the invisible power of these vessels. In addition, ancient people might have used these vessels for medical treatment since the electricity is used for stimulating the muscles.
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only 3 days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work 5 days a week for shorter hours TPO 30 70
- when teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- TPO 27 80
- TPO 23 80
- TPO 28 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, in addition, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 335.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26865671642 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58165642127 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477611940299 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9321228532 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.769230769 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7692307692 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.535049720796 0.272083759551 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193109067044 0.0996497079465 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116744778815 0.0662205650399 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316280375132 0.162205337803 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938380583228 0.0443174109184 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.