TPO 40
The lecturer and the reading discuss the presence of a permanent station on the surface. Although the passage claims that the Venus' surface has not a suitable situation for the human station, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this paper.
First and foremost, the passage points out that the surface pressure of the Venus is 90 times greater than the surface earth pressure so that all spacecraft crash with the Venus surface. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this idea by claiming that people can establish station that flooding on the surface of the Venus. This station makes about 50km above the surface of the venus. In this situation, the pressure is as the same as the earth pressure.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that Venus surface dose does not have oxygen and water; hence, it makes a problem for spacecraft. The professor argues that the Venus surface has other components such as carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. In the station, people can make oxygen from these components and also extract water from carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid.
Finally, although the reading passage says that cloud cover above the venus surface; therefore, the sunlight does not arrive on the surface and the station can not make electricity. Nevertheless, the professor argues this idea by pointing out that these clouds that located at a high level are not thick enough to block the sunlight. So, these will allow the sunlight to go throw. Also, clouds reflect the sunlight. Furthermore, people can use this reflection to produce electricity. Consequently, people can produce energy from these power stations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, hence, nevertheless, so, therefore, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17647058824 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4667775233 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492647058824 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1998263886 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8666666667 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337922853761 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118016163211 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494196237217 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208890141888 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425659811825 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.