TPO 41
Both the author and the lecturer discuss the necessity of new regulations on coal ash disposal. The author proposes the idea that new regulations are not needed. However, the lecturer casts some serious doubts on this notion and provides a number of counter-arguments in response.
To begin with, the author stated that some regulations already exist and adequate. For instance, power companies now are forced to use liner-special material, which prevents soil to get contaminated. On the contrary, the lecturer clarified that these regulations are not sufficient because using these materials could not preserve drinking water from harmful chemicals. In addition, these regulations are for new sites that power companies build and old ponds are not forced to use the liner.
Moreover, the reading and the lecture were at odds in other point. The reading put forward the idea that by disclosing the environmental danger of coal ash, consumers of products that built from recycled coal ash, stop buying it. However, lecturer asserts that there are many products, which made from recycling harmful materials and costumers are not worry about them.
Finally, the writer of the article explained the last thesis, which was the cost of operating the new regulations forces power companies to increase their price of selling electricity. This rise in rates could be about ten times. Yet again, the lecturer repudiates this one too. As she says according to amount of operating costs, this increase in price is just about one percent and do not make general public resent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... just about one percent and do not make general public resent.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25793650794 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71143856522 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575396825397 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7127100556 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6428571429 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395713458239 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117900086543 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943671211546 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208037992926 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046311125423 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.