Tpo 53
Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of social benefits.
The reading and lecture are both about to discourage the public to consume fewer cigarettes and unhealthy food. The author of the reading feels that the presenting proposal will helpful for society. However, the lecturer challenged the claim made by the author. He is on the opinion that the argument of benefit and other tax can be challenged not necessary been healthier.
To begin with, the author argues that the high tax rate discourages people to buy cigarette and other junk food. He also mentions that it will help people to reduce obesity rates. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He states that the high tax rate influence people to buy the cheaper and low-level product which is produced by harmful ingredients. Thus, it is more harmful than the previous product. Moreover, people will buy more expensive food with that money and less distribute money on healthy food.
Second, the writer suggests that it will fair to society when the tax is distributed to the people who engage with unhealthy activities. He also elaborates this by mentioning that as a result, some responsibility will transfer to society. However, the lecturer rebuts this by mentioning it will be unfair with the people of lower-income compared with higher-income people because they paid the same amount of tax. He also claims that it will create some new financial issue for the low-income people which is unacceptable.
Third, the author posits that government will be benefited by the high tax rate and can use this finance for developing social welfare like building the stadium, creating a public park, public education etc. In contrast, the author position is that if the government rely on this tax will not able to establish a fundamental solution. He also noted that if the government implementing some las like banding smoke on the public place and private place it will eradicate the harmful effect and also increase public awareness.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, thus, in contrast, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0652173913 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68047506394 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496894409938 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7922114704 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9411764706 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171107030203 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606499481728 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621620734355 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111624653325 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251318129161 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.