tpo1
TPO1-Task1
This set of the material in both reading and lecture is about reduction in working days for employees. The passage mentions that if the companies by mandatory policy reduce their working days from five-days working to four-day week , it will be more suitable to both company and employees for a couple of reasons. On the other hand the lecturer holds an opposite view and he refute the passage claims by saying that it is not beneficial, because he look at this issue from different perspective.
First, although the reading expresses that shorter workweek can be economical, the lecturer opposes to this idea and states four day week working requires to more costs. The more the employee, the more office spaces and computers are required which all is by default leading to more expenditure. Also this condition will force the company administrators to pay more money in order to training new clerks.
Second, reading suggests that in this plan, for every four-day employee there will be a new employee that can be hired to do the job. The lecturer rejects this idea as well, saying that hiring new employees will cost more and there is no guarantee the amount of job opportunities increases as a result of more four-day week workers. Besides, the company expectation will be higher and they will expect the four-day week employee to the same amount of job as five-day employees.
Finally, the author emphasizes that this plan would be advantageous for employees, which enables them to allocate more times for their personal enjoyment. However, the speaker has different opinion, by saying that, shortening days of working time may lead to job instability, as a result, the employees will lose their job in this critical economic condition. Also, four-day working will harm the employee’s chance to become advanced in their job. Additionally, most of the companies may prefer five-day workers in order to consistence supervision and continuous coverage, so this kind of workers cannot achieve promotion in their job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-20 | Haleh Rezazadeh | view | |
| 2023-05-20 | Haleh Rezazadeh | view | |
| 2023-05-03 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-28 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | heartqq | 80 | view |
- TPO-02 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statementIn twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today. 76
- tpo1 3
- saving money or traveling? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...days for employees. The passage mentions that if the companies by mandatory poli...
^^
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions that if the companies by mandatory policy reduce their working days from f...
^^
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y mandatory policy reduce their working days from five-days working to four-day...
^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir working days from five-days working to four-day week , it will be more suita...
^^
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...from five-days working to four-day week , it will be more suitable to both compan...
^^
Line 2, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e suitable to both company and employees for a couple of reasons. On the other h...
^^
Line 2, column 382, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
... lecturer holds an opposite view and he refute the passage claims by saying that it is...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 456, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'looks'.
Suggestion: looks
...g that it is not beneficial, because he look at this issue from different perspectiv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...pposes to this idea and states four day week working requires to more costs. The mor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...by default leading to more expenditure. Also this condition will force the company a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, well, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13213213213 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74942419953 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525525525526 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3353313946 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.461538462 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0235797104306 0.272083759551 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0148925574522 0.0996497079465 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515893323237 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.